WASHINGTON – The United States Department of Justice is facing mounting criticism after it reversed its earlier pledge to release sensitive documents related to the investigation of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The department, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, had initially assured that key materials from the Epstein case, including potential names and logs, would be made public. However, in a recent clarification, officials stated that the documents would not include any “client list,” and confirmed that no such list exists in the investigation records.
A memo released by the department explained that over 300GB of data had been reviewed, with no new evidence suggesting Epstein was murdered. The department reaffirmed that his 2019 death was a suicide, as determined earlier.
The Justice Department’s decision has sparked frustration among political commentators, victims’ advocates, and high-profile social media figures, who accuse the administration of backtracking and shielding influential individuals.
Attorney General Bondi defended the move, stating that releasing certain materials could violate legal standards and compromise the privacy and safety of victims. She added that several files contained illegally obtained or protected content, which cannot legally be made public.
The reversal has also drawn criticism from conservative voices, who had expected full transparency. Prominent figures, including former President Donald Trump, have expressed support for Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, while calling for public focus to remain on “legally sound accountability.”
Despite public pressure, the Justice Department has reaffirmed that no further files related to Epstein’s alleged associates will be released, citing legal, ethical, and procedural constraints.
The controversy underscores the broader debate over transparency, justice, and the protection of victims in high-profile criminal cases involving powerful individuals.
Reported by PakTribune International Desk
All rights reserved.