NEW YORK, United States — An international peace prize linked to the FIFA World Cup has ignited widespread debate after being associated with a Trump-affiliated global initiative, drawing mixed reactions from political leaders, sports officials, and civil society groups around the world.
The award, promoted as a recognition of football’s role in fostering global unity and conflict resolution, was announced amid growing scrutiny over the political undertones surrounding its sponsorship and international messaging. Supporters argue that sport has long served as a bridge between nations, while critics question the motives and symbolism behind the initiative’s leadership.
Organisers stated that the prize aims to highlight football’s power to promote dialogue, cooperation, and peace across borders, particularly during major global tournaments such as the World Cup. They emphasized that the award is intended to remain apolitical and focused on humanitarian impact.
However, the association with figures connected to former US president Donald Trump has prompted concerns about politicisation, with observers warning that global sporting platforms risk becoming entangled in geopolitical narratives. Analysts say the controversy underscores the delicate balance between sport, diplomacy, and international influence.
Football governing bodies have so far remained cautious, reiterating commitments to neutrality while acknowledging football’s undeniable global reach. Human rights advocates have also weighed in, urging transparency and clarity over how recipients are selected and how the prize aligns with broader peace-building efforts.
As discussions continue, the episode has reignited broader questions about the role of major sporting events in global politics and whether initiatives tied to them can truly remain above political divides.
This story has been reported by PakTribune. All rights reserved.