ISLAMABAD – As Pakistan’s political temperature continues to rise, voices within the national discourse are urging a more measured and responsible approach — warning that criticism of political parties, particularly PTI, must not be stretched to the point where it is framed as anti-state behaviour.
Political analysts note that robust critique is essential in any democracy, but equating political opposition with hostility toward the state is a line that should never be crossed. The concern comes at a time when the national conversation has grown increasingly polarised, with sharp accusations and fiery rhetoric overshadowing rational debate.
Observers point out that Pakistan’s political history is filled with intense disagreements, yet branding an entire party as “anti-state” based solely on political differences sets a troubling precedent. Such framing not only distorts legitimate political debate but also risks deepening societal divisions and weakening the democratic fabric.
Analysts warn that when political criticism becomes indistinguishable from accusations of treachery, it undermines public trust in both the political process and national institutions. They argue that disagreements — no matter how sharp — must remain grounded in facts, democratic principles and constitutional norms.
In this climate, the call for civil, respectful discourse has taken on renewed urgency. Experts stress that Pakistan’s political actors must uphold a standard of debate that encourages accountability without feeding hostility, and challenges narratives without damaging national cohesion.
As tensions persist, observers say now is the time for all sides to step back and recognise the difference between critique and condemnation — for the sake of Pakistan’s stability and democratic integrity.
This story has been reported by PakTribune. All rights reserved.