Pakistan News Service

Wednesday Sep 17, 2014, Zul-qaadah 22, 1435 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :
Pakistan News Home -> Top -> News Details

White House plays down Rouhani crowing on nuclear deal

16 January, 2014

  Related News  
Obama repels new Iran sanctions push, for now
Kerry says Iran may not be ready for final nuclear deal
  Related Articles  
Hype over interim nuclear deal
By Asif Haroon Raja
America's first choice - Iran or Pakistan
By Asif Haroon Raja
  Related Speakout  
Iran Missiles Test
Indian Air Bases & Israel Strike against Iran
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

WASHINGTON: The White House on Tuesday dismissed an aggressive claim of victory by Iran's President Hassan Rouhani over an interim nuclear deal, and attempted to face down rising domestic political pressure over the pact.

Washington said Rouhani's comment that world powers were now bowing to Tehran was a symptom of domestic politics and insisted the deal, curbing aspects of Iran's nuclear program in return for limited sanctions relief, hinged on its words and not its rhetoric.

"It is not surprising to us and nor should it be surprising to you that the Iranians are describing the agreement in a certain way towards their domestic audience," spokesman Jay Carney told reporters.

"It does not matter what they say, it matters what they do."

Rouhani's comment, on his official Twitter account, played into complaints of hawkish members of the US Congress that the deal, due to come into force on January 20, gave too much up to Iran for too little in return.

"Our relationship w/ the world is based on Iranian nation's interests. In #Geneva agreement world powers surrendered to Iranian nation's will," the tweet said.

The White House is fighting a battle to prevent Congress from slapping a new round of sanctions on Iran which it says could cause the Islamic republic to walk away from the negotiating table, and eventually push Washington into a war to thwart Tehran's nuclear program.

Supporters of tightened sanctions say they have at least 59 votes in the 100-seat Senate and may be heading towards the 67-vote threshold needed to override the veto that President Barack Obama has promised. There is also strong backing for new sanctions in the House of Representatives.

Some lawmakers have been irked by White House warnings that voting for new sanctions could unleash a train of events that could lead to war with Iran.

Senate Majority leader Harry Reid has so far declined to bring the sanctions bill to the floor, noting that 10 key Democratic committee chairs have called on him to thwart the passage of any measures that could scupper the nuclear diplomacy.

Reid spoke a day after Obama publicly called on lawmakers to hold off on new sanctions to avoid disrupting his nuclear diplomacy — taking place after more than three decades of Cold War-style antagonism between the Islamic republic and a nation it derides as the "Great Satan."

Lawmakers who support the bill say tough sanctions brought Iran to the negotiating table and stiffer measures would increase Obama's leverage in talks between Tehran and the P5+1 group of world powers.

The new measures target the petroleum, mining and engineering sectors of Iran's economy, but supporters say they would only come into force if Tehran stops negotiating in "good faith."

Some lawmakers have not taken kindly to warnings from the White House that backing more sanctions was was effectively a vote for war.

"I think that is absolutely untrue, an irresponsible assertion, and ought to be clarified and retracted by those who have made it within the administration," said veteran Democratic congressman Steny Hoyer, who nevertheless welcomed the interim deal as a positive step.

The Obama administration is also denying claims that the interim deal reached after weeks of talks in Geneva, included a secret side deal on implementation.

End.

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Imran - Qadri long march
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Sit-ins 'fruitless'; have no logical end: Hashmi
Qadri orders 'Go Nawaz Go' currency campaign
Suggested Sites