Pakistan News Service

Saturday Jul 26, 2014, Ramadan 28, 1435 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :
Pakistan News Home -> Top -> News Details

Supreme Court rejects Babar's plea against Rana Sanaullah

21 October, 2011

  Related News  
LJ leader added to US global terrorist list
Nawaz calls for civil-military joint strategy on Balochistan
  More on this View All

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) has rejected former federal law minister Babar Awan's application against Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah for giving statement that Awan was liable to be murdered.

The court disposed of the application with this observation that if Awan feels aggrieved he may approach the authority concerned. Justice Ghulam Rabbani, who retired on October 19, gave this verdict after hearing Awan's application against Rana in his chamber. "In my view of the reply furnished by Sanuallah, to which no rejoinder has been filed, and after hearing the learned Punjab Additional Advocate General (AG) there appears to be no convincing reason to proceed further on this petition," he held in the judgment.

The Punjab Additional AG had ensured the apex court that there was no danger to the life and liberty of the petitioner from Sanaullah or the Punjab government and that the petitioner would have full protection, which even otherwise was the fundamental right of a citizen in accordance with provision of the constitution.

Earlier, Sanaullah, in his five-page reply, denied his statement and stated that he had already given a clarification regarding the matter in a session of the Punjab Assembly, adding that leader of the opposition in Punjab Assembly Raja Riaz had accepted his clarification. He also said it was wrong to say that he had threatened to kill the former law minister.

Talking to our sources, Ramzan Chaudhry, counsel for Awan termed the decision one-sided. He said though the petitioner had given the application to record the evidences as well as the statements of different people including the journalists against the Sanaullah but he was not allowed, which was against the Article 10-A of the Constitution. The counsel said that they would again approach the court for reopening of the case against Sanaullah.

Awan on June 20 had moved an application in the SC against Sanaullah saying that his life was in danger. He prayed to the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) to form a judicial commission to examine the records and witnesses pertaining to the statement of Sanaullah and protect his (applicant's) rights under Article 4 and 9 of the Constitution. He said court's intervention in the matter was necessary from another aspect too as Sanaullah was also a part of the judicial commission which appoints judges of the constitutional courts. He said if anything happens to his life, property or family, Sanaullah should be held responsible.

Awan said he had also learnt that Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif's government wanted to arrest him on a false charge or some other pretext and then facilitate an attack on his life either in jail, police station or a local court. The applicant said the public announcement by Sanaullah, for all practical purposes and intents, amounted to passing of an extra-judicial death sentence against him, particularly keeping in view the trends of extra-judicial killings by the Punjab Police. Under the circumstances, he said, there was imminent threat to his life from Sanaullah and others.

End.

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
Blocking Nato supply line
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
No martial law until three elections after NRO: Shehla Raza
Plane crash in typhoon-hit Taiwan kills 47
Suggested Sites