Pakistan News Service

Wednesday Sep 17, 2014, Zul-qaadah 22, 1435 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :
Pakistan News Home -> Letters To Editor -> News Details

Shariah Which Shariah... By Col.(r) Riaz

13 February, 2014

Ever since the start of the parleys by the Muzakrati Committee constituted by the Prime Minister, Talibaan have come up with certain preconditions for any fruitful talks. Maulana Abdul Aziz of Lal Masjid is in the fore front with his demand for the imposition of Shariah in Pakistan as according to him the Constitution of Pakistan is not Islamic. His main argument against it is that justice is not meted out to the common man under the Anglo-Saxon laws and that the Qazi courts would ensure speedy justice. The Maulana is right to some extent but it is not the law that is to be blamed for the long drawn litigations. It is its modus operandi and the delaying tactics adopted by the lawyers and the witnesses that delay the justice and this is what needs to be improved to obtain the desired results.

Imposition of Shariah will have its own implications, the first and the foremost being which Shariah and of which Fiqah? Just to cite ! an ordinary example - cutting of the hand of a thief. Which hand ? Left or right ? From what place?, Wrist or the fingers? Will the thumb also be chopped off or not? Different fiqahs have different answers for it. Next, can rape be proved under the Islamic laws unless committed openly in a market? In the event of a woman lodging a complaint for having been raped and later not being able to produce four male and saleh eye witnesses to the act, would stand condemned for having committed adultery and stoned to death for having made the confession herself!! Would the modern forensic evidence and inferences – the DNA and other laboratory tests etc. be admissible under the Shariah?

In reply to such matter-of-fact arguments it is normally said that just give the Shariah a chance and wait and see. Our this tendency to "Wait and See" turns us into silent spectators and when the worse happens we bemoan it in the wisdom of the hindsight. Why can't we foresee and perceive the enormity of the coming catastrophes and take steps to thwart them before they over take us. The case in point is our inadvertently being sucked into ultimate imposition of the Talliban brand Shariah by holding negotiations with the extremists. Why can't we say an emphatic NO to it right now and stop negotiating this issue any further? Imagine, negotiating (discussing) Shariah and religion and that too with the ignorant, uninformed and rigid clerics with shallow and superficial knowledge of Islam!

Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Rawalpindi

Reader Comments:

Well said... col. saheb.

Science should win over ignorant & blind opinions.

Khalifa-10, - 26 August, 2014

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Imran - Qadri long march
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Sit-ins 'fruitless'; have no logical end: Hashmi
Qadri orders 'Go Nawaz Go' currency campaign
Suggested Sites