Pakistan News Service

Wednesday Oct 1, 2014, Zul-hijjah 6, 1435 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :
Pakistan News Home -> Top -> News Details

Riaz files petition against 'unlawful' Suddle commission

12 September, 2012

  Related News  
SC dissolves Shoaib Suddle commission
AG Qadir questions judges' conduct in Dr Arsalan case
  More on this View All

ISLAMABAD: Challenging the Supreme Court's August 30 judgement about investigation of the Arsalan Iftikhar case, real estate tycoon Malik Riaz's counsel, Zahid Bukhari, on Tuesday moved a review petition stating that the judgement had been passed without lawful authority and jurisdiction as the order did not describe under what law the one-man commission of Dr Shoaib Suddle was constituted to carry out the probe.

The petition argued that the judgement amounted to giving preferential treatment to a specific party.

Bukhari argued that there were serious apprehensions and doubts about the independence of Suddle as he actively participated in the wedding of Arsalan Iftikhar and Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry and his family attended the marriage ceremony of Suddle's son in December 2011. He said Suddle's relations with Arsalan Iftikhar and his family would be a hurdle in conducting a fair inquiry.

The counsel said the petitioners were not consulted before appointing Suddle's one-man commission. Judicial powers for probe could not be awarded to a member of executive, who was not a judicial officer, he said, adding that the court could not pass an order of entirely different nature without annulling its June 14, 2012 order.

He said the judgement amounted to preferential treatment for one of the parties concerned and violation of fundamental rights of the petitioner as guaranteed under the articles 4 and 25 of the constitution, which provide that every citizen has right to be treated strictly in accordance with the law without any discrimination.

Bukhari stated that in the judgement, all the points raised by the petitioner had not been answered by the court. In these circumstances, the court had omitted to take notice of points and objections raised by the petitioner before the bench regarding maintainability of review petition and jurisdiction of the court. He requested the court that the concise statement filed by NAB and the petitioners be treated as an integral part of the petition.

End.

Reader Comments:

we are waiting for changing in investigation commission...

sunny, Pakistan - 14 September, 2012

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Imran - Qadri long march
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
PML-N put an end to VIP culture, claims Pervaiz
Fight erupt as 'go Nawaz go' echoes in NA body meeting
Suggested Sites