Pakistan News Service

Tuesday Oct 23, 2018, Safar 12, 1440 Hijri
Pakistan News Home -> Tribune Corner -> News Details

Panama case is not similar to Imran Khan case: Justice Faisal Arab

16 December, 2017

  Related News  
Imran Khan in-Jahangir Tareen out
SC to give verdict on Imran Khan-Jahangir Tareen disqualification case today
  More on this View All

ISLAMABAD: Justice Faisal Arab has categorically rejected the perception that the plea seeking disqualification of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan was factually similar to those in the Panama case, wherein Nawaz Sharif was disqualified from being member of the National Assembly.

He observed that those who come into power with an intention to indulge in financial corruption would want such off-shore companies to remain operational in order to secretively park their ill-gotten wealth. “In the present case (Khan’s case) the offshore company was not incorporated to park assets acquired from wealth accumulated through embezzlement or bribery or through tax evasion to keep it hidden from public eye,” Justice Faisal Arab, who is member of three-judge bench hearing the case, observed. In his 11-page additional note, the judge said that the factual controversy in Panama case was drastically different from the facts of Khan’s case. “In that case (Panama case) serious allegations of money laundering, corruption and possession of assets beyond known means were made against Mian Nawaz Sharif after he held public office,” he observed.

In fact, the note added, Nawaz Sharif held high public offices several times in the past 30 years in his capacity as finance minister, chief minister and prime minister. The judge observed that the sources of acquiring several assets were not only unsatisfactory but none of the assets including UK flats, Azizia Steel Mills in Saudi Arabia and others were acquired prior to Nawaz Sharif holding the high profile public offices. “It is a case of acquisition of an asset from legitimate tax paid income earned abroad and that too at a time when respondent No 1 (Imran Khan) was a non-resident Pakistani holding no public office cannot be perceived with the same suspicion,” observed Justice Arab. The judge further observed that Khan’s party formed a government in the Kyber Pakhtunkhwa but Niazi Services Limited (NSL) was allowed to dissolve statutorily on account of non-filing of annual return for the year 2014. He added that those who come into power with the intentions of corruption would want such off-shore companies to remain operational in order to secretively park their ill-gotten wealth.

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites