Pakistan News Service

Sunday Oct 26, 2014, Muharram 2, 1436 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :
Pakistan News Home -> Top -> News Details

Obama repels new Iran sanctions push, for now

31 January, 2014

  Related News  
White House plays down Rouhani crowing on nuclear deal
Kerry says Iran may not be ready for final nuclear deal
  Related Articles  
Hype over interim nuclear deal
By Asif Haroon Raja
America's first choice - Iran or Pakistan
By Asif Haroon Raja
  Related Speakout  
Iran Missiles Test
Indian Air Bases & Israel Strike against Iran
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama appears to have prevailed, for now, in a campaign to stop Congress from passing new sanctions on Iran he fears could derail nuclear diplomacy.

Several Democratic senators who previously backed a bipartisan sanctions bill publicly stepped back after Obama threatened a veto during his State of the Union address on Tuesday.

Several sources familiar with behind-the-scenes maneuvering on the bill say a number of other Democratic senators signed up for more sanctions had privately recoiled from a damaging vote against their own president. The developments appear, in the short term, to have checked momentum behind the bill, which had appeared headed for a veto-proof majority in Congress.

"I am strongly supporting the bill but I think a vote is unnecessary right now as long as there's visible and meaningful progress" in the negotiations, Senator Richard Blumenthal told AFP, after first expressing reservations earlier this month.

Democratic Senator Chris Coons made a similar declaration at a post-State of the Union event hosted by Politico.

"Now is not the time for a vote on an Iran sanctions bill," he said. Another Democratic Senator, Joe Manchin, now hopes Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will not bring it up.

"I did not sign it with the intention that it would ever be voted upon or used upon while we're negotiating," Manchin told MSNBC television.

"I signed it because I wanted to make sure the president had a hammer if he needed it and showed him how determined we were to do it and use it if we had to." The White House mounted an intense campaign against a bill it feared would undermine Tehran's negotiators with conservatives back home or prompt them to ditch diplomacy.

Obama aides infuriated pro-sanctions senators by warning the measure could box America into a march to war to halt Tehran's nuclear program if diplomacy died.

The campaign included a letter to Reid from Democratic committee chairs urging he put off a sanctions vote.

Another letter was orchestrated from a group of distinguished foreign policy experts.

Multi-faith groups also weighed in and coordinated calls from constituents backing Obama on nuclear diplomacy poured into offices of key Democrats. The campaign appears for now to have overpowered the pro-sanctions push by hawkish senators and the Israel lobby, whose doubts on the Iran nuclear deal mirror those of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Senator Johnny Isakson, a Republican co-sponsor of the legislation, said: "It looks like we're kind of frozen in place."

Those behind the anti-sanctions campaign though privately concede they may have won a battle, not a war.

The push for new sanctions will flare again ahead of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's (AIPAC) annual conference in March, which Netanyahu is expected to address. It could also recur if the talks on a final pact extend past the six-month window set by the interim deal.

But for now, groups that supported the push against sanctions celebrated.

"This is a major victory, a crucial victory for the American public who don't want to see a war," said Kate Gould of the Friends Committee on National Legislation.

"For right now, it looks like it's not going to be brought up," she said but warned "there'll be other efforts to try and sabotage the process."

End.

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Imran - Qadri long march
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
SC asks attorney general to help define sadiq, ameen
Growing use of drones in law enforcement may violate HR, warns UN
Suggested Sites