Pakistan News Service

Saturday Dec 20, 2014, Safar 27, 1436 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :
Pakistan News Home -> Letters To Editor -> News Details

Is not Pak-US dialogue strategic?... By Eschmall

11 February, 2014

Christine Fair's February 9 article, Ten Fictions that Pakistani Defense Officials Love to Peddle, seems to be a response to Stephen M Walt's February 3 Foreign Policy magazine article, The Top 10 Mistakes made in Afghanistan, which is part of the growing anti-war criticism against the Obama administration.

According to Walt, the US is trying to go it alone: blowing it at Tora Bora; helping introduce the Afghan constitution; the detour into Iraq; the 2009 surge; setting a time limit; downgrading diplomacy; losing public support; failure to manage unruly allies and strategic contradictions are the top ten reasons of the US Afghan war failure. Ms Fair has tried to justify these acts by the US in her recent article. Her Ten Fictions are meant to serve US interests while ridiculing Pakistan's sincere efforts as well as unparalleled contributions in the US-led war against terrorism. Ms Fair's long stay in Pakistan, especially her teaching engagements in Lahore were a great learning experience for her that provided her a rare chance to meet the top Afghan war observers, including the author of Descent into Chaos Ahmed Rashid. These interactions helped her in writing a compelling book, Fighting to the End: the Pakistan Army's Way of War.

In her article Ms Fair has argued that the just resumed 'strategic dialogue' has never been strategic. Well, thanks to the carrot and stick policy and the do more mantra of her governments that have been dictating terms in the name of strategic partnership, natural allies, friendship and strategic dialogue. It also reminds one of the call that the former Assistant Secretary of State Armitage made to Musharraf and the demands or the so called 11 points that Colin Powell dictated to Pakistan's president.

Though Pakistan has suffered the most at the hands of terrorism, there is no respite from allegations and accusations against the intentions of Pakistan. Ms Fair thinks that $ 27 billion in aid could compensate for the loss. Should it not be called small thinking by big brains controlling the world through their prowess in technology, science and military might? Ms Fair has acceded though that the US policymakers never fully appreciated that the Afghan war could not have been won without Pakistan's cooperation. She goes on to say that the problem was not lack of understanding about Pakistan's importance: the problem was, by and large, a na´ve belief in Pakistan's desire to cooperate and a miscalculation about how Pakistan perceives its national interests.

Eschmall Sardar
Peshawar

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Imran - Qadri long march
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
LHC tells Sharif family to pay Rs 3.5bn mark-up on loan
Osama's killer comes forward to reveal his name
Suggested Sites