Pakistan News Service

Sunday Apr 20, 2014, Jumada-al-thani 19, 1435 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :
Pakistan News Home -> Iraq -> News Details

Fall of Fallujah a bitter pill for US veterans

10 January, 2014

WASHINGTON: For American veterans of Fallujah, seeing al Qaeda militants regain control of the Iraqi city is a painful sight, leading some to question what they were fighting for nearly 10 years ago.

The bloodiest combat of the US war in Iraq took place in Fallujah in two intense battles in 2004, with US Marines rolling back militants in days of brutal street fighting.

But now al Qaeda flags are flying over Fallujah in western Anbar province after extremist gunmen swept into the city last week.

Their gains illustrate how security is unraveling in Iraq, two years since US forces pulled out of the country.

"It's a bitter pill to swallow," said David Bellavia, a retired Marine staff sergeant who was awarded the Silver Star, one of the military's most prestigious combat decorations, for his role in the battle. "This administration has decided Iraq is not important," he told a local blog in his hometown of Batavia in New York state.

Some Republican lawmakers, including Fallujah veteran Duncan Hunter argue that the violent extremists could have been contained if President Barack Obama had pushed harder to keep some US troops on the ground in Iraq.

"I think the overwhelming feeling is anger," said Hunter, who served with the 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment in Fallujah.

"The administration let our victories count for nothing."

Other veterans were more philosophical, saying it was never clear what American forces were doing there in the first place and it was up to Baghdad to secure Iraqi cities.

"Over the years looking back on my two deployments to Iraq, I have wondered if there was something from there that was worth all the fighting, death and destruction.

"I haven't found that yet," said Chris Garrett, writing on a Fallujah veterans Facebook page.

Throughout the Iraq conflict, Fallujah and the Anbar region stood out as a hotbed of insurrection. In April 2004, the death and mutilation of four employees from the private security firm Blackwater led to a US offensive against insurgents in Fallujah.

The American troops were accused of employing harsh tactics and causing excessive civilian casualties in their fight with militants. Coalition forces later handed over control to local Iraqis in the city but insurgents gradually reasserted themselves, leading to the second battle of Fallujah in November-December 2004.

More than 10,000 US Marines took the fight to the insurgents in what was codenamed "Operation Phantom Fury," backed up with massive artillery fire as they rooted out militants block by block.

The cost was high, both for the US troops and Iraqi civilians killed in the fighting.

"It's heartbreaking to see the deterioration of the situation in Iraq, especially given the many sacrifices of US service personnel to give Iraqis a chance for a better future," said Peter Mansoor, a retired colonel who served as executive officer to the former commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus.

After Washington sent in reinforcements in 2007, US forces "were the glue that held Iraq together" and "were seen as honest brokers by most Iraqi sects and factions, especially the Sunnis who had partnered with US troops to fight al Qaeda," Mansoor said.

The withdrawal of US forces from Iraq was a mistake that opened the way for extremists to resurge, he said.

Fellow "Phantom Fury" veteran Theodore Lester shared a similar view, saying the fall of Fallujah was inevitable.

"We broke it, taped it back together, then claimed it was brand new as we threw it down and walked out the door," Lester wrote on Facebook.

"This is the beginning of a new civil war for them. My only surprise is that it didn't happen sooner."

End.

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
Blocking Nato supply line
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Outspoken Abidi resigns from Senate
President Mamnoon sacks PEMRA Chairman
Suggested Sites