Pakistan News Service

Friday Oct 20, 2017, Muharram 29, 1439 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :

US-NATO firing in N Waziristan

29 June, 2007

By Amir Latif


  Related News  
Govt to use 'other options' if Taliban talks fail: Nisar
Pakistan plans military operation in North Waziristan: WP
  Related Articles  
Stop Thinking of Negotiations with Terrorists
By Zaheerul Hassan
Aimless talk-and-talk strategy
By Asif Haroon Raja
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

Till the morning of June 23, Pikhawar Khan was a happy man. A father of two sons, and a daughter, and grand father of four grandsons, Pikhawar had no idea what that day had in stock for him.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO-led US helicopters and jets fired on the makeshift house of Pikhawar Khan located in Shawal valley of Pakistan’s troubled northern tribal belt near Pak-Afghan border leaving a heap of debris behind of the bodies of his nine family members who died on the spot.

The air strike was conducted to kill the militants, who according to NATO spokesperson, were preparing for an attack on allied troops in Afghanistan.

Gratitude to NATO spokesperson, and Pakistani government for regretting the killings of Pikahawar's family, but it was too late. Seventy-year old Pikhawar was a weak and powerless man, and had no resources to avenge the killing of his family members. The only way he chose to get rid of the pain and grief, was to take his own life.

Pikhawar shot himself dead after he saw the bodies of nine members of his family, including three women and four children.

“He shot himself dead in front of some 8-10 people after some hours of seeing the bodies of his family members”, Pazir Khan, a neighbour who managed to escape the air strike told weekly Pulse on telephone.

“He (Pikhawar) was so disturbed… and kept crying and laughing. I can’t explain his condition. He kept crying, and all of a sudden he started laughing loudly”, he said.

“We did try our level best to console him. Initially, his condition was not too bad, but after seeing the bodies of his grandsons, he lost his courage”, Pazir said.

“ Light-emitting balls hit our houses, but mainly his (Pikhwar’s) house, leaving a heap of debris behind”, Pazir said adding, “ Pikhawar was not at home at the time of the attack, that is why he managed to survive, but his two sons, two daughters-in-law, a daughter, and three grandsons were killed”.

He said only one child of Pikhawar’s family survived the bombing by gun-ship helicopters and aircraft. Pikhawar left two brothers and seven nephews and nieces to take care of the only survivor.

“Machinegun rounds and artillery shells were fired from planes and helicopters, which shook the entire area,” he said. A small restaurant was also hit by rockets, killing and injuring many people, he told.

Walls of Pazir’s house were also damaged by a shell, however no casualty occurred.

A Wana-based journalist, who visited the area on condition of anonymity, confirmed the incident. “Residents told me that after bombing Shawal valley, the helicopters and jets started pounding the nearby Rakha area along the Afghan border in the South Waziristan. NATO and US-led forces started intense shelling on houses in Rakha, in which 20 people were killed and scores of others got injured”, he mentioned.

“People have started leaving the affected areas, as tension has gripped the entire region. Local people fear more air strikes in the area. Violation of Pakistani airspace by allied jets and helicopters has become the order of the day. It’s just that sometimes it gets reported in the media, and at others not. But the locals, especially women and children are getting psychologically affected”, he maintained.

The journalist said that the fresh incident has fanned the already charged atmosphere in the area.

“ Local people told me that many of the youth have vowed to conduct suicide attacks on allied troops operating just a few miles away from the area”, he said. “Pushtuns never forget their revenge. They retaliate even after 100 years. The highly charged atmosphere against America is not merely religiously motivated. The revenge-based sentiments are running high there. Youth are angry over deaths of their dear ones”, he added.

Surrounded by untamable mountains, the forest-covered Shawal valley, shot to fame in 2003 after US and Pakistani intelligence agencies reported the presence of Osama Bin Laden hiding there.

NATO-led force in Afghanistan has admitted the killings of civilians in the air strike against militants who had been seen near the border preparing an attack.

NATO’s International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) spokesman Major John Thomas told newsmen that the air strike was conducted with the “coordination” of Pakistan Army.

The claim, however, was strongly rebutted by Pakistan Army. Pakistan Army spokesman, Major General Waheed Arshad says that Pakistani army neither coordinated nor was it informed about the strike.

“The ISAF’s spokesman’s claim is incorrect. I don’t want to comment further on this issue. Pakistani government is contacting the concerned (US and NATO) authorities in this connection”, he told newsmen.

 He said at least nine civilians were killed “when a rocket fired by foreign forces hit their home”. However, locals claim that at least 33 civilians were killed in the strike.

“Media is exaggerating the death toll of civilians”, the army spokesman claimed adding that “NATO’s confession and apology on civilians’ killings is a good sign”, he contended.

NATO spokesman claims that about 60 militants were killed in the operation. Follow-up investigations found civilian casualties amongst the dead, he said.

“We have reports that one of our weapons hit a building which may have had a number of civilians in it and that building may have been a home or way-station or some hotel facility,” Major John Thomas said.

“We regret the loss of innocent life and our prayers are with the families of those who died.” The strikes had been carried out in coordination with the Pakistani military which was also involved in the investigation to find out how civilians were killed, he said.

The force had crossed the border mistakenly, Thomas said.

Professor Shamim Akhtar, a veteran security analyst believes that NATO’s apology over killings of civilians is a mere eyewash. “They have just regretted the killing of Pakistanis. What would be their reaction if Pakistanis kill 10 Americans and regret?” he questions.

“It has been a routine affair that US aircraft trespass into Pakistani airspace with impunity, and no one is there to stop them”, he said and added “the NATO spokesman’s claim regarding cooperation of Pakistan Army in civilians’ killings is a matter of shame for us”.

 “America doesn’t care about our sovereignty. Wherever and whenever it wants, it strikes. Pakistani government only condemns the US attacks after they occur”, he opined.

Professor Akhtar thinks that until US leaves the region; there will be no decrease in extremism. “Until US and other foreign forces are here, there is no chance of decline in growing phenomenon of so-called extremism. In fact, US forces are the main reason of extremism in the region”, he said.

“It is better for the USA to leave this region as soon as possible if it wants peace”, he suggests.

Reader Comments:

Afghan War, Northern Alliance, and our tribal areas

==============================
Afghan War, Northern Alliance, and our tribal areas
==============================


Northern Alliance soldiers are sitting right across from the border from Pakistan and they are mad as hell. Mix them with Indian chankias and you got a potent mix of intrigues against Pakistan and Pushtoons.

Northern Alliance was never comfortable with Pushtoons and Pakistan. Now they have a chance to misdirect NATO's awesome force against the tribal areas. This allows Northern Alliance to kill two birds with the same stone.

This is the time that Pakistan and Afghan Pushtoons figure out a way to keep their tempers in control. Otherwise they will end up taking steps against each other, thus playing right in the hands of NA + Indian alliance.

It is time to discourage anarchy and help establish peace in Afghanistan. This is the only way to show who has the true interest of Afghan people in mind. It will also show the true colors of Northern Alliance and its hidden masters.

peace.


Dr. Qazi (DrShaheenIqbalQazi@yahoo.com), United Kingdom - 30 June, 2007

External forces

Force can not bring permanent peace (forget foreign force). This is like containment.

Nikus, Hungary - 30 June, 2007

Oh Rabbani?

Nato is fighting the proxy war for Burhanuddin Rabbani
and his followers.

Khalid Rahim, Canada - 01 July, 2007

Compensation for the affected.

An Appology by Nato must at least redress the wounds of the affected with the hope that there would be no repeat.

When you admit your error through appology, you can make this appology compensating as well to show some moral grounds.

Pak government condemning of the tragic incident also shows that there is all out effort for no repeat.

It is only through understanding and compassion that the parties involved will keep the issue pacified.But, finanacial compensation to the relatives of innocent victims from Nato/US
will win some moral points for America, which is the sole super power of today and it must show some humanitarian image to match its military grandness.

The key thing here is that Nato/US do honest inquiry over who fired missiles and why did they did the act that killed innocent civilians.

Pakistan government has conducted the peace roll, but there were casualties in dozens.This could create more anti US feelings amongst Pashtoons in particular and that is the last thing US wants in its drive for pacification of Afghanistan.Casualties should allways be avoided as America/Nato will be better off winning the hearts amongst Pashtoons rather than letting happen tragedy of this kind.

As peace must be the main drive, all parties including America and every body else should look at ways to de-escallate the fighting.US/Nato should worry about bigger threats elsewhere rather than creating enemies amongst poor pashtuns.Pashtuns are not anti-American. Rather they are pro-independent minded throughout history.

The geo strategy of Pakistan and Afghanistan may keep America/Nato trying to stay put in the region. But their stay will sustain better through the environment of relative peace.

US/NATO ARE WEALTHY AND THEY CAN OFFER ASSISTANCE TO THE TRIBALS TO MOVE AWAY FROM BORDER AREAS.FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE WILL WORK MUCH BETTER AND THE WHOLE BORDER AREA CAN BE KEPT DEMILITARIZED FOR PEACE KEEPING SAKE.

TELLING AMERICA TO LEAVE IS LIKE A SMALL ANIMAL OF THE JUNGLE TELLING THE TIGER TO GO AWAY. BUT TOO MUCH KILLING OF THE INNOCENT CIVILIANS CAN SPOIL IT FOR EVERY BODY INCLUDING AMERICA.
AMERICA'S SORRY AND PAKISTAN'S PROTEST SHOULD BRING IN SOME HUMANITARIAN SHOW OF FACE WITH COMPENSATION FOR THE RELATIVES OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS WITH A SOLEMN CONDUCT OF NO REPEAT.
DE-ESCALLATION OF FIGHTING BY ALL SIDES WILL BE THE BEST THING TO HAPPEN.

AND NATO/US WILL EARN SOME HIGH MORAL GROUNDS IF THEY KICK IN FINANCIAL COMPENSATION FOR THE RELATIVES OF INNOCENTS CIVILIANS KILLED.

LET US HOPE, WISH AND PRAY THAT IT ALL WINDS DOWN TO SUSTAINED PEACE FOR ALL.

Anwar Mahmood, Canada - 01 July, 2007

oh pakistan !!

one thing is sure, Pakistan is on the way of distinction.. Pakistan is being screwed up by everybody..her politicians, her people, her 58 years policies and all other countaries which are suffered badly by such an illitrate and backward country...

Patriot, United Kingdom - 03 July, 2007

USA can't leave

Last time US left, it resulted in rise of Taliban and 9/11. Departure of US would only allow extremists to extend their reach and conduct more international terrorist attacks. If our own government refuses to take away the extremists' safe haven, US has no choice but to remain engaged.

Abdul Rashid Ghazi, Pakistan - 03 July, 2007

Where is that Pakistani nation

Where is that Pakistani nation, where is that 160 Million Pakistani. Where is the Pakistani Foj whose duty to protect borders. Why they are atacking civilins in pakistan by calling them terroists. Why we treat Waziristan out of Paksitan why we are leting for goverment or armed forces to make differences, I afraid we should have to handle the issues by force and by force of a nation a Paksini nation who made Paksitan for Islamic rules not for US or NATO. We have to stand and kill these uniformed terrorists. Or wait for our family got killed its just our choice to Die with honour or die as a traitor

Khuram, Pakistan - 04 July, 2007

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites