Pakistan News Service

Monday Jan 21, 2019, Jumada-al-awwal 14, 1440 Hijri

The biggest threat to the West lies within itself, not with Islam

17 October, 2007

By Simon Jenkins

  Related News  
US suspends anti-Islam 'military course'
Shootings and bombings in and around Baghdad killed six people
  Related Articles  
Acknowledgement of the Truth
By Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmood
On Propaganda and Islamophobia
By Abukar Aman
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All

I remember as a small boy going from door to door in our village collecting money for a missionary ship, the John Williams. It was taking God to the heathen of the East Indies, a distant realm to which the Good Lord, despite His all-seeing wisdom, had carelessly (and I thought excitingly) denied His presence. It never occurred to me that the natives might adhere to some other faith. I saw them waiting eagerly on the beach for the Bible to be carried ashore, wondering only why the Royal Mail was so slow.

Last week a 29-page letter to the Pope was issued from a galaxy of 138 Muslim leaders designed to refute any such exclusive creed. It pleaded for better understanding between Christians and Muslims, based on a shared monotheism and the affinity between the Bible and the Koran. Both contained commandments to love a single god and to love one’s neighbour. The archaic language boiled down to hoping that the two religions might respect each other because “the future of the world depends on peace between Muslims and Christians”.

The letter is certainly an advance on the first missive to Nicephorus, a 9th-century prince of Rome, from Harun al-Rashid, a Muslim caliph.

Addressing “thou Roman dog”, Rashid wrote, “I have read thy letter, O thou son of an unbelieving mother. Thou shalt not hear, thou shalt behold, my reply.” He proceeded to massacre half Byzantium.

Rashid’s successors are more circumspect. They implicitly rebut George Bush’s “He who is not with us is against us” speech after 9/11. “Islam is not against the Christians,” the letter declares, “so long as they do not wage war against Muslims on account of their religion, oppress them and drive them out of their homes.” Nor is this debate “simply a matter for polite ecumenical dialogue between leaders”. The “eternal souls” of those who “relish conflict and destruction” are at stake, not to mention “the survival of the world”.

Coming at the end of Ramadan, the letter is impressive. The signatories embrace a global range of grand muftis, imams, sheikhs and scholars from all denominations of Islam, with a wide span of theological influence. The appeal to religious tolerance at a time of tension between Islam and the West is welcome. But what the letter means needs deconstruction.

Religious leaders like to claim headlines by subjecting politics to a downpour of platitude. The letter makes no mention of (monotheistic) Jews, let alone Hindus and Buddhists. It merely invites the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury and others to acknowledge what the archbishop calls “their common scriptural foundations . . . as a basis for justice and peace in the world”. Two religions that embrace “half of humanity” should stand together or, by implication, there will be war.

Such an implication is grandiose, dangerous and wrong. It implies that the Muslim world has a politico-military power that is in some sense equal and opposite to that of Christianity. This elevates the so-called jihadist tendency within Islam to a status that it does not have and should never think it has. It suggests Islam has sufficient power to confront and possibly undermine the West. It implies a balance of power parallel with a balance of theological interpretation.

Such an implication feeds a no less dangerous paranoia in the West. By stating that the “survival of the world” might turn on a struggle between Islam and Christianity, the letter reinforces the militarist fantasies of neoconservatives who see the world as just such a struggle. It is a paranoia which, since 9/11, has driven the “war on terror” and fomented the tension and antagonism to the West to which the scholars’ letter is so vacuous a response.

The chief threat to world security at present lies in the capacity of tiny groups of political Islamists to goad the West into a rolling military retaliation. Extremists on each side feed off the others’ frenzied scenarios so as to garner money and political support for their respective armies of the night. Each sees the other as a cosmic menace and abandons communal tolerance and peaceful diplomacy to counter it. The authors of this letter would be better employed vetting their own blood-curdling mullahs and madrasahs than in writing platitudes to the Pope.

I am proud to be a cheerleader for western values. I see the West - proxy for the letter’s “Christians” - as powerful without precedent. The American-European economic and political axis is unconquerable. For all its occasional and manifold lapses, capitalist democracy has been tested and not found wanting. Other societies such as Russia, China and India all measure themselves against the West’s success and seek in varying degrees to emulate it. To this extent Francis Fukuyama was right to call the end of the cold war “the end of history”.

The Muslim world is more detached. Its religious habits scare nervous westerners into seeing it as a shrouded, black-clad menace. It is a less ordered society and more capable of perpetrating, or at least excusing, outrages against western targets. But these outrages are of frustration rather than conquest. While they can kill people and destroy property, they do not “threaten the West”, let alone undermine western values. If any Muslim state were rash enough to declare a war of aggression against Europe or America, of which there is no sign, it would be beaten.

There is no Saladin or Tamerlane riding out of the desert to subject the West to a new caliphate. There is rather a job for the police, local and international, one at which they seem reasonably competent. America and Britain, for example, have each seen just one successful attack by Muslim terrorists in the past decade. While other attacks have been forestalled, we would be mad to see them as constituting a war of civilisations and religions.

There may be young Muslims and their teachers with a vested interest in talking up such a war. There are those in the West with the same interest, such as the booming armaments and security industries with their think tanks and lobbyists.

Such vested interests need to be exposed as such. To portray Islam as a whole as a concerted threat to western security, and to imply that the West’s democratic institutions and freedoms are not proof against that threat, is absurd and close to treason. Then to demand that western freedoms be dismantled and stored away for the duration of a “war on terror” is to wave the flag of surrender.

This defeatism led the American Congress to allow its president to authorise torture and detention without trial in what Senator Robert Byrd called “the slow unravelling of the people’s liberties”. It enabled a British Home Office to curb free speech and habeas corpus. It arms police, fortifies buildings and impedes the free movement of citizens. It makes every Christian suspicious of every Muslim.

This poison has not been generated by the teaching of Sayyid Qutb and his Al-Qaeda fanatics, but in the overreaction to them. After sowing their mayhem they, and not Afghanistan and Iraq, should have been targeted and eliminated. The belligerence and ineptitude of western policy over the past decade has turned nobodies into heroes of the Muslim world. The most incompetent period of western diplomacy since the 1930s has left the West hated and cities everywhere at the mercy of any Muslim misfit with a sack of explosive.

When Thomas Paine told America that “we have it in our power to begin the world over again”, he meant by example, not military conquest. His utopianism was a brave, confident and open-hearted one. That of his successors is sinking into the opposite, a fearful, besieged, security-obsessed wimpishness, in which Muslims rightly feel threatened by the arbitrary violence of the American right.

It is ironic that defeat in the cold war should have led Russia to the exuberant self-confidence of Vladimir Putin’s Moscow, while victory has plunged the West into a loss of nerve. In both Washington and London are leaders who have so little confidence in democracy as to regard it as vulnerable to a few madmen, and who have so little respect for democracy’s freedoms as to suspend them at the bang of a bomb.

I believe in the robustness of the democracies created in the West over the past half-century. I am not sure that our leaders do.

Reader Comments:


The author should read the history of Afganisthan and Pakistan (centre of art and knowledge. Language theory was invented by Panini in present day Pakistan) and Egypt/Mishor (Excelence in engineering and medicine). That should provide enough clue, what harm Islam can cause to humanity.

Nikus, Hungary - 17 October, 2007

Islamic society compared to hindi society

Dear Nikus, I don't blame you for your hate towards Islam, you grew in a country where genocide of minorities is officially patronized.
Your words are exactly what they teach you in India. Where as remaining world's history is not exactly the same.
It is not difficult to prove that it was non-Muslims who harm more to the cause of humanity.
Let’s take the example of hinduism, it has does not give same respect to all hindu humans and have no respect for any other religion of world, incl. Judhism and Christianity.
Some hindu gods require human sacrifice, burning women alive, similarly there are many more inhuman ceremonies in some un-Islamic religions, which can be termed more inhuman than Islam which has always fought against oppression of helpless and categorized all humans same.
I invite you to study Islam before you speak big words against it based on your false knowledge.
I'm a Chritian living in Islamic state and never been singled out based on my religon. I think society where I'm living is much more humane than your's.

Daniel, Ecuador - 18 October, 2007

Islamic letter to christians

I wish there would be peace within Islam. When Sunnis and Shiites stop killing each other it will seem like a more peaceful religion. No members of any other religion bomb other sects in their own religion. The killing has been happening since Mohammed died and I hope to see it end in my lifetime.

Chris, Pakistan - 18 October, 2007

US will fall

I am a God fearing American that loves the US just as all the immigrants do. But I also agree that the US will fall into warring factions at some point. True democracy doesn't work, and it was not what the founders wanted. Democracy ends up just people buying votes. Why do you think most unions, gays, and blacks all vote democratic in the US? It's so they can get more and more handouts which Hitlery guarantees. All civilizations changes governments routinely...just look at Russia which has headed back towards communism with no free speech in media or trade.

It's too bad, but I really wonder if humanity as a whole just cannot support tolerance.

ryan, United Kingdom - 19 October, 2007

Read the history and follw the events

Please read the history and follow the events. What is the contribution of your country towards humanity before Islamisation and after that? I am not fan of organised religion. History has proved what harm it can do to humanity.Galileo is nice example of that.
There is nothing called hinduism and nobody we disrespect for being a person of other part of the world or other culture.(we have no concept of THE prophet who is THE messenger of god. We don't follow any doctrine. In India, there are more than 30 dominant cultures. Still we survive without any conflict between them.). Have you ever been to India? I request you to read the book "The Story of Civilisation" by Will Durant.

Nikus, Hungary - 20 October, 2007


Can you eat pork in public eataries in Egypt? How many such options you get there in day to day life? Can you christians marry moslem girls and convert to christianity without threat?

Nikus, Hungary - 20 October, 2007

Last Friday, I embraced Islam.
I found Islam a true religon which covers all spheres of life and teaches to deal with justices and kindness.

Daniel, Ecuador - 22 October, 2007

US has defeated itself.

President Bush is peeping pits and ponds to find a way out of the various quagmires he landed himself into due to his senseless initiatives purely based upon deceit and farce. His recent statement about failing initiatives in Iraq and the surge in violence being compared equivalent to the US experience in the Vietnam War speaks volumes about the gloomy perspective.

It is interesting to note that,after Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, President George H. W. Bush had explicitly sought to initiate, as he had put it to the Congress, a "new world order." He made his momentous declaration on Sept. 11, 1990. Note the date. A first 9/11, which took place in 1990. Strangely, exactly eleven years later, on the mystical date of 9/11, his son started to finish what the father began. The junior Bush launched a war against the man who wowed to kill his dad, initiating. in fact, the opposite of the order or "the world disorder".

Ironically, all initiatives started by Bush tend to backfire. Elusive Al Qaeda's has remained defiant after capture and elimination of some of its top commanders and has reinforced its mythical malevolence. Taliban have re-surfaced with vengeance. The Northern Alliance is dis-integrating. The United States had never been more isolated in its history. Its deceptive approach has destroyed its credibility worldwide and world disorder is emanating from Washington, spreading to all directions. Emotional intensity of the 9/11 trauma in the US citizen has dissolved into a feeling of betrayal and they helplessly feel themselves trapped in the very cage, which their elected leaders made for the others, to make them happy and prosperous. They hopelessly observe failure of one US initiative after another, escalating rather than diffusing terror threats.

Panic stricken actions are adding fuel to fire. In its attempts to get rid of threatening elements, the US in its utter desperation, has started to imitate them. Its establishments and agencies have institutionalized their deceitful characteristics to an extant that, the U.S has become its own opposite. A nation of triumphant freedom now restricts and curbs the freedom of others. A nation, which had articulately cultured balance of power ,now destroys the balance of power abroad; a nation of creative enterprise now imports it from its adversaries and above all, a nation of forcefully direct expression now disrespects the truth.

Whatever happens in Iraq, Afghanistan or even Iran and Pakistan, the main outcome of the war for the United States against its own created terror is clear. It has defeated itself as a triumphant nation.

M.Saeed, Pakistan - 22 October, 2007


what you know about islam you Illiterate wana be Panini was a Sanskrit grammarian and trust me Hinduism has given nothing to the world except mythology and idol worship or worshiping of 360 million unknown god’s or I say creatures like hanuman or like snake… or Ganesh and Islam has invented math algebra, science and art and architecture most famous Taj mahal and many beautiful mosques and you talk about Panini it sound tome like a Indian recipe, get you act and fact right then reply on any other religion you read these un-factual books get the right ones you just cannot assume..peace out

saad, Pakistan - 23 October, 2007

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites