Pakistan News Service

Sunday Nov 19, 2017, Safar 29, 1439 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :

Road to restoration

03 March, 2008

By Zahid F Ebrahim


  Related News  
SC moves on PTI plea for votes verification
Protests if poll grievances not addressed: Imran
  Related Articles  
Pakistan Election 2013 - An overview
By Zaheerul Hassan
'Election on May 11, Come What May' Kayani's unflinching resolve
By F Z Khan
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All

The newly elected parliamentarians are searching for a method to restore the pre-Nov 3 judiciary and fulfil the mandate given to them by the people of Pakistan. Those who have been rejected by the electorate claim it cannot happen without a two-thirds majority in parliament. President Pervez Musharraf has claimed that the present courts are a fait accompli and that there is no legal basis to restore the pre-Nov 3 judiciary.

 

However, the road to restoring the pre-Nov 3 judiciary requires no legal underpass or any constitutional flyover. It does not require a two-thirds majority in parliament to amend the Constitution as the president's men claim, nor even a simple-majority resolution by the newly elected representatives. It requires only the will to perform our constitutional duty.

On Nov 3, 2007, the Government of Pakistan, starting from its president and down to the faceless police officers manning the

barricades in the Judicial Colony in Islamabad, have acted in violation of their constitutional duty. Article 190 of the

Constitution says: "All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan shall act in aid of the Supreme Court of Pakistan." Yet, since Nov 3, the Government of Pakistan has refused to act in aid of the Supreme Court. In fact, the executive authority of the country has acted, in open defiance, to subvert and strangulate the apex court.

In the late afternoon of Nov 3 news broke that President Musharraf had suspended the Constitution by a so-called Proclamation of Emergency and arrogated to himself the right to amend the Constitution as he pleased and the authority to dismiss the judges of the superior courts of the country as it suited his fancy. This action, as the president himself boasted as being unconstitutional, was not entirely unexpected. Apprehending such an illegal act, an application had been filed in the Supreme Court on Nov 2 by the lawyers, challenging the president's election.

Within hours of the issuance of the PCO, a seven-member bench of the Supreme Court, led by the chief justice passed an order that changed the course of history. The bench ordered that "[the] government has no grounds/reasons to take extra- constitutional steps," and proceeded to restrain president Musharraf and Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz from "undertaking any such action which is contrary to the independence of the judiciary." The Supreme Court restrained Pakistan's "Civil and Military authorities…[from] acting on the PCO" and held that "no Judge of the Supreme Court or the High Courts chief justice(s) shall take oath under the PCO…"

For the first time in Pakistan's judicial history, the majority of its Superior Court judges resisted a coup d'etat. However, the executive authority refused to come in aid of the Supreme Court. In gross violation of its constitutional duty, the executive authority detained the judges and obstructed them from carrying out their judicial duties.

After passing the order on Nov 3 suspending the PCO and other unconstitutional actions of President Musharraf, the Supreme Court bench directed that the case be put up before the full court on Nov 5. But on Nov 5, the judges of Pakistan were under illegal detention.

On the road to restoration, the path before the newly elected government is remarkably simple. After taking oath of office, the new prime minister must pick up the phone and direct the local administration in Islamabad and the four provincial capitals to act in aid of the order passed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan on Nov 3. Consequently, the barricades in the Judicial Colony Islamabad will be removed and the illegal restraints on the chief justice and other judges will be lifted. Chief Justice Iftikhar M Chaudhry and other honourable judges will be driven to the Supreme Court building and escorted to their chambers and their courts. This simple directive will be repeated in the four provincial High Courts. Thus, the judiciary of Pakistan will stand restored. The mandate given to the newly elected representatives by the people will stand fulfilled.

There are, of course, complex questions of law for lawyers to mull over. What will be the consequences, if any, for those individuals who violated the order of the Supreme Court dated Nov 3? What will be the status of those individuals who have taken oath in violation of the Supreme Court's order? What will be the legal effect, if any, of proceedings taken in various courts after Nov 3? These questions cannot be answered by the newly elected parliament. These questions can only be answered by the restored Supreme Court of Pakistan.

One last question which plagues all discussion on the issue of the restoration of the judiciary is what will happen to President Musharraf? Well, the restored Supreme Court will resume its hearing of Justice Wajihuddin's petition challenging the eligibility of Mr Musharraf to contest the presidential election. The Supreme Court will decide the fate of Mr Musharraf in accordance with the law, and not the opinion of Condoleezza Rice.

All seemingly complex and convoluted constitutional absurdities will stand resolved if the newly elected government performs its constitutional duty and acts in aid of the Supreme Court's Order dated Nov 3, 2007. That is the road to the restoration of the judiciary.

End.

Reader Comments:

The Conflict?

The former CJ put a brake on
the NRO.The present CJ gave his blessing to NRO.Lets have a referendum amongst all
the Elected Members by secret
ballot.Whomever wins the vote
takes over as the CJ.

Khalid Rahim, Canada - 07 March, 2008

Road to restoration

Why all learned people like the writer of this article are doing best to put up a case that CJ and his associates be given back their jobs. CJ was a Chief Justice not a political leader of any party. Why was he associated and joined the political parties in their processions and protests. If he was so keen why could'nt he left his job and either joined a political party or floated his own to his likings. A man who stepped out of his jurisdiction and code of practice and being given support and involved in many illegal activities was wrong. Many Chief Justices are changed in the US There was no such cries, why? They understand that country must be run smoothly and any obstruction and anti country activites must be curtailed and dealt with. In Pakistan people like to criticise just for their own popularity. All judges are paid well and protected by law and must be happy. President Musharraf has to run the country with all odds when US is the neighbour. There are many wise steps he got to take to stablize the situtions though not easy under the circustances when so many of his country men are just after him and they are all wrong. Look at that what good he has given to Pakistan together with his team. Comapare with previous governments of Civilians PMs. They all robbed the country and bought mansions in the west. President Musharraf is a good man and must be left alone.

Mohammad, United Arab Emirates - 08 March, 2008

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites