Pakistan News Service

Sunday Oct 22, 2017, Safar 1, 1439 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :

Presidential Election a critical overview

05 April, 2007

By Amjad Malik


Next few months in Pakistan will determine whether we can still come on the road to real democracy or the nation will have to wait further.
  Related News  
Govt finalises draft of national security policy: Nisar
Govt okays targeted action in Karachi
  Related Articles  
Evolving regional scenario around Pakistan
By Asif Haroon Raja
Pakistan's Internal and External Challenges
By Dr Sohail Mahmood
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

Next few months in Pakistan will determine whether we can still come on  the road to real democracy or the nation will have to wait further. Its long  exhaustive wait and  democracy is  long over due in Pakistan. Our establishment needs to think rationally to bring  Pakistan back to its original route for which Quaid e Azam made Pakistan without  the assistance of an established military force and with the aid and support of  commoners who opted out for Pakistan instead of United India.

This was achieved  solely on sheer determination to safeguard the interest of Muslims of United  India and on ‘one man one vote’ rule which is extinct since the country’s birth  in a short political history of Pakistan which is  clouded by military regime(s) in  General(s) Ayub, Yahya, Zia and now Musharaf’s form covering around 4 decades  out of 60 years of Pakistan’s physical life.

There has been several news reports where President assured of taking his uniform off as per agreement but he did not keep his promise to which lawyer  community has found unease upon this kind of unconstitutional decision making  which has kept Pakistan derailed from real civilian rule so far and that may not  be the intentions of SC in Zafar Ali Shah case when SC gave Gen Musharaf 3 years  to hold elections post military coup on 12 October 1999. Furthermore,  independent and fair elections are impossible if President of the nation who defiantly violates the constitutional position of Federation and solidarity to all irrespective of their stance of opposition is addressing only one party functions and as the elections are nearer, it is very difficult not to take them  as ‘political processions’ in the run up to election thus making him partisan  linked with the aspirations of PML(Q) his own brand of political party which was  assembled as a result of suspending one clause of Constitution, by horse trading  and using NAB is a switching tool after coup to counter PML(N) alone. This  tendency of lack of respect of the rule of law, unconstitutional mannerism  undermine the effective role of judiciary.

The whole nation is trying to digest the  insistence of General Musharaf to retain  his uniform post 31 December 2004 in violation of his pledge to nation which is  keeping Pakistan away from true civilian rule and there is no contingency either  in place. He is retaining his second cap against the agreement with MMA one of  the main alliance emerged as a result of 2002 elections who supported the  General in legalizing his former acts in the form of 17th amendment  to the constitution and since are regretting to believe the dictator on uniform  issue as per Senator S M Zafar’s book ‘Dialogue on the Political Chess Board.’  This insistence is also in contravention to article 63(1)d of the Constitution  of Pakistan 1973. Article 63(1) d says as following: 63 (1) A persona shall  be disqualified from being elected or chosen as, and from being, a member of the  Majlis-e-Shoora [Parliament], if –  (d) “he holds an office of profit in the service of Pakistan other than  an office declared by law not to disqualify its holder;  or” If we see his reign briefly we see his tactics somewhat hasty, he took  over the state of business on 12 October 1999 as a result of a military coup and  used a term ‘chief executive until 2001.

In June 2001 he dismissed assemblies and assumed the office of President which became vacant after the resignation of  President Rafiq Tarar. To date Mr. Tarar is of the view that he is still the  duly elected President of Pakistan. General Musharaf has the privilege to send  twice elected Premier, sitting Chief Justice and duly elected President home for  reasons unknown constitutionally in the case of two latter sending backs.

On 30 April 2002 he held referendum and declared himself the President  with people’s vote of confidence. On 24 August 2002 General Musharaf announced  constitutional reforms package widely knows as LFO (Legal Frame Work Order) and  as a result of new elections General Musharf took new oath as President on 16 November 2002.In December 2003 his constitutional reforms were affirmed by the  Parliament under Constitutional Amendment No 17. Under this amendment not only  his LFO was made part of Constitution but his Presidency was confirmed too.  Under this amendment article 41 was changed which deals with the Presidential  Election. Now  legal expert are of the view that his tenure comes to an end on 16 November  2007, some constitutional experts dispute that but to advance the discussion we  take his latest oath & vote of confidence to start with. Article 41(5)  confirms that Presidential Election(s) can be held 60 days before or 30 days  after the expiry date of his current Presidency so ideally fresh election time  frame will be ideally from 16 September to 16 December 2007.  

Now the issue arises whether he can be re elected in Uniform, if we see  the Article 63(1) d the answer is no, if we keep in view the overall intention  of the 1973 Constitution of Pakistan, again the answer is no as ‘Uniformed Presidency’ gives a horrific picture of a Democracy only 3 countries out of over 166 countries in the world who have similar tendencies & regime, Burma is an other and Thailand recently joining the club. However, if we look at his previous trail of unconstitutional reforms marathon which include, his PCO, Judges sacking & oath under PCO, Referendum, Legal Framework Order, 2002  Elections, Local bodies system & polls and WPB Act 2006, it does not seem  impossible that he will definitely attempt for the top slot.  

His elections will be held under article 41 (3) & (7) of the  Constitution. Now whether the President gets himself elected from the current  assemblies which is unprecedented act as no assembly in the past voted twice for  the President is one question. The other question is the political and  constitutional implication of such election on the state of play as under  Article 44(2) & Article 63(1)d the issues will need to be decided whether he  can retain his uniform whilst going to electoral college and will it be his  second or 3rd term. 17th  Amendment brought back in the Constitution most of the ‘8th  amendments’ provisions which were originally introduced by former military  dictator and were repealed by the Civilian Prime Minister unanimously.  17th amendment as well as an Act of Parliament to allow a General to  remain in Uniform in contravention to Constitutional provision of art 63(1)d may  be declared ultra vires as it hits the basic intention of the constitution and  are unconstitutional mechanism where COAS an employee of state takes the role of  head of state.

However as  President kept his uniform post 31 December 2004 at a time when article  63(1)d became effective and decided  otherwise to his promise to nation and current Parliamentary party readily  passed a bill in Parliament to allow

him to keep ‘two offices’ then we may  expect the following from the President in coming  days:

a) President may rely on his current strength in the shape and form of Q league and may bargain with the one of the main political parties one way or the  other and get himself elected from these assemblies. Political parties on the  name of ‘giving exit to army’ may opt out to vote him for next term. I feel  personally that he may struggle to gather this kind of support due to  disadvantage to political parties except Q league but the air tells that deal is  negotiable and is available with certain sections of our current political Parties. In that situation uniform will be an issue and ‘two offices Act of  Parliament’ may be used to counter that argument and this will be an ideal situation for President which will allow him to have his Presidency and command of armed forces to do whatever he likes with 2007 General election(s). Or  President announces and holds fresh General elections before his own Presidential election is due either on the advice of Premier or by dismissing  current assemblies if the ‘resignation(s)’ of opposition parties mature and  brings new electoral college ideally of his own choice and numbers before his  election is due from 16 September to 16 December 2007.

b) Alternately, President may dismiss the current assembly upon resignations of opposition parties if they get together and or on the current prevailing  situation in the country very nearer to the expiry of his term so that he avoids  his election, announces elections under care taker set up and throws election as  a bait, that way he takes the sting out of any opposition movement and his own  election and uniform issue goes in the back drop of fresh elections. In that situation his own election will be held once the new electoral college is formed  and that will again be his wishes to retain maximum powers & numbers. In  that situation if he places his bet on Q league for future his election then  unprecedented rigging may be in the offing and Punjab may be under a ‘chowdry’  in a care taker set up. That will be very alarming as fairness will not suit him  as he may loose election, may not be Presidential candidate and on top of that  may be asked to lay off his uniform as well by the coming  Premier.

In all these situation what opposition can or can’t do will be very  crucial. The only option which is strong and viable is that the electoral  college is vacated by current opposition the moment current President announces  his Presidential election if he does decide for that  before General election though it will  be a defensive position but opposition after resigning may initiate strong  struggle to stop that election and demand for fresh general polls under care  taker set up and independent election commissioner on one point agenda. 

There is an attacking strategy too ideally as Mian Nawaz Sharif former premier proposed to opposition parties to vacate the house now and continue up right struggle for free and fair elections under impartial care taker set up, to  me ideally under judges as very few political stalwarts are left untarnished by  our military regime(s) whom the political parties jointly will trust for holding  election. In effect, the names of care taker set up nominees may further divide  the opposition, and judges may be the best bet, in office or retired judges may  be decided. In that situation, President will have no choice but to get elected  from the next electoral college and opposition demands for fair elections under  a neutral care taker set up and independent Election Commissioner as agreed by  all parties where ‘Judiciary’ as a monitor is free to dispense justice  independently without cloud of PCO’s fair to all parties. At that time if with  sheer will fair elections are held, that will close the chapter of current  military regime in Pakistan for the time being. To end it completely politicians  will need to show political maturity, will and sacrifice in the interest of  Pakistan. Federation and future of Pakistan lies with democracy which is not  possible unless and until free elections are held under independent care taker  set up where Election Commissioner is neutral and independent and judiciary  needs to play its role.

In all this process Supreme Court’s role will be crucial as SC will be  asked to determine few questions which are  following: *Whether General Musharaf’s first reign of President from June 2001 to  16 November 2002 in which he held referendum on 30 April 2002 to legalise his  stay at office as well may be classed as one and whether he has finished his  two tenures if that regime was legal under Article 44(2) of the  Constitution. *What is the actual date from which his first or current tenure as President of Pakistan started.  * Finally, the most important of all is, can General Musharaf retain his  uniform and contest next Presidential Election against the letter and Spirit  of the Constitution 1973 and in particular article 63(1)d which is effective  from 31 December 2004 and can a simple majority  Act of Parliament with supra  constructional intentions override the operation of Article 63 as opposed to  the requirement to amend the Constitution with 2/3  majority. Supreme Court’s ruling will be very crucial & if not given in time  will lead to  prolong one man’s rule  against the wishes of millions of Pakistanis whose will is already negated. SC  gave 3 years to the dictator in Zafar Ali Shah case and its 4 years beyond that  3 years limit and there is no sign of him going and there is no one to ask the  man when will you leave.  I think  its time that ‘one man one vote’ principle and an in born right of the people is restored and establishment lay back and let the people decide what they want,  and who they want and democracy in its true form is allowed to as Abraham  Lincoln said’ Government of the people, for the people and by the  people.’

Reader Comments:

Presidential Election

The writer os this artcile is playing with the words and perhaps he is associated with political parties of the left who are against the existence of Pakistan let alone a so called democratic system he is trying to dream. Pakistan has done too good under military regime(s) of General(s) Ayub, Yahya, Zia and now Musharaf. Covering around 4 decades out of 60 years of Pakistan’s physical life can prove that there have been less money laungering than the civilian dictators Pakistan had like BB and Nawaz Sharif. During Nawaz Sharif his supporters invaded SC and it has not happened during any military rule. There is no military rule as such in Pakistan, though the President is in Uniform sometime and that is the need of a country like Pakistan which is mostly corrupt with the leader who are there waiting for an opportunity to grab the power and destroy the economy again. That is not possible no matter what some writer give their views to media. The government of Pakistan will not allow a repetition of the past and a stable government is esential so that growth is carried forward.If he remembers should go back to the elections of US when George Bush lost and some fiddling was done and then the decision was asked by the Court where some influence must have been used. Mr. Quail left politics altogether as he was so much disgusted. Give an example of any government you call a demoratic with clean records.Giving an example of Abraham Lincoln what he said’ Government of the people, for the people and by the people is hardly true in 21at Century. A democratic system which is ideal for Pakistan is just right and further improvements are on their way. Elections will be held and its upto the people to cast their votes honestly and not to give it to them who got a bad record and are corrupt. Nation got to show how responsible they are in selecting their leader. As far as President is concerned he is OK as he is whether he is in UNIFORM OR WITHOUT SHOULD MAKE NO DIFFERENCE TO ANYONE IN THE WORLD LET ALONE PAKISTAN. If he keeps his UNIFORM nothing wrong with that. He will be paid only for one job and will work without any emolumant for the other title he holds. Pakistan is doing fine with an economic growth of 7% and so much has been done in seven years no governments of the past ever had the ability to expand the economy as its today. International companies are moving into Pakistan and buying Banks and other projects. Why worry about Presidential election, they will be held in accordance with the paliamentary rule and the Book which is called a Constitution.


mohammad, United Arab Emirates - 05 April, 2007

The nation of Pakistan was created on theocratic priniples,"Allah Factor".
Sovereinity belongs to Allah and not to the people in the "Islamic republic of Pakistan". This myopic vision of the founding fathers has caused the current debacle. It has becme politically incorrect and almost blasphemous to speak out against both of these factors. This fundamental flaw in the costitution has led to the lack of effective leadership. Repeated army interventions lead to short term gains and long term failures and corruption. Pakistan is caught in the vicious cycle of Mullah (Allah)& Army.

syed adeeb, Pakistan - 06 April, 2007

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites