Pakistan News Service

Tuesday Sep 2, 2014, Zul-qaadah 7, 1435 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :

Pakistan-US Fractured Relations

06 November, 2012

By Asif Haroon Raja


  Related News  
PM Nawaz says talks with President Obama positive
Nawaz, Obama vow cooperation as tensions ease
  Related Articles  
US-Pak Ties Need Improvement
By Zaheerul Hassan
USA responsible for making Pakistan most dangerous country
By Asif Haroon Raja
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

Historically Pak-US relationship has always been marked by convergence and divergence of national interests that kept on switching from friendship to friction. The US gained more during the times of convergence of interests but periods of divergence outweighed the former.

Although Pakistan earned the title of 'most allied ally of USA', it is also the most sanctioned country in the world. By putting all its eggs in the basket of USA, Pakistan gained less as it was not given the required support by the US when needed most. The US left Pakistan high and dry during the 1965 War and in the 1971 War which led to the disintegration of the country. In fact, the US later imposed severe penalties, embargoes and sanctions on Pakistan. This unholy practice of sanctions was repeated in 1979 owing to nuclear related suspicions and in 1990 after the successful culmination of Afghan War in which Pakistan had played a key role in defeating erstwhile USSR. Worst was that USA embraced India which had all along remained in Soviet camp. It imposed additional sanctions after our nuclear tests and after Gen Musharraf's military coup. The US stood on the side of India during Kargil conflict and forced Pakistan to unilaterally vacate the occupied heights. Pakistan remained on the wrong side of USA from 1990 till September 2001.

In the post-9/11 scenario, Washington decided to once again befriend Pakistan since it knew that without its active support, Afghanistan venture may prove very costly. Pakistan happily accepted the role of a front-line state to fight global war on terror and to forsake Mullah Omar led regime in Kabul under the illusion that all its economic woes would be addressed. It agreed to assist the invading forces by way of providing air bases, logistic supply routes, airspace for air sorties, and intelligence cooperation. Instead of extracting matching returns, all these concessions were doled out to the needy USA very cheaply.

Pak-US alliance was purely a marriage of convenience but the US succeeded in duping Pakistan that it would not leave Pakistan in a lurch again. In reality, the US strategically aligned itself with India, Israel, Britain and Germany and Northern Alliance (NA). After capturing Afghanistan and installing a puppet regime led by Hamid Karzai, the six intelligence agencies of the strategic partners led by CIA embarked upon a massive covert war against Pakistan using Afghan soil to achieve its hidden objectives. Concurrently, the US gave a green signal to India to consolidate its position in Afghanistan. This was despite the fact that India doesn't share border with Afghanistan, it is a Hindu country where Hindu extremism is constantly rising, and has played no role in war on terror. Yet, the US vowed to let India fill the vacuum once it departs and to make it a key player in Afghan affairs. Other than lucrative defence and economic agreements, the US granted India civilian nuclear deal and is now striving to make it a permanent member of UNSC as well as of exclusive nuclear club.

Since the US had made Pakistan its ally under an agenda, bilateral relations saw a shifting policy pattern to dubiousness, and Pakistan remained target of accusations from all sides. There were frequent swings in US mood towards Pakistan; particularly the inconsiderate warnings of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Secretary Defence Leon Panetta, former CJCSC Admiral Mullen and even Barack Obama which caused discomfiture and more annoyance in the country. To the utter dismay of Pakistan the US kept doling out series of highly productive rewards but gave very little to Pakistan. The US paid no heed to the security concerns of Pakistan but remained ever worried about India's mostly fabricated concerns. Even now it is seeking critical favors for India at the cost of Pakistan's national interests.

The US brokered Pak-Afghan-Transit-Trade-Agreement (PATTA) on July 19, 2010 allowing transportation of Afghan goods through Wagah to India and in return Pakistan getting permission to use Afghan territory for trade with Central Asian Republics (CARs). The US twisted Pakistan's arm to make India part of PATTA so as to allow India to export goods to Afghanistan and beyond through Wagah border, grant MFN status to India and liberalize visa regime. Efforts are now in hand to pressure Pakistan to allow India to transport merchandise goods to and from Afghanistan without giving anything in return except for deceptive promises that trade with India will be of great benefit to Pakistan. A new opening is being given to India despite the fact that there is a serious trade imbalance in Indian favor. Unable to compete with India, it will adversely impact Pakistan's manufacturing industries and will also negatively impact Pakistan's trade with Afghanistan and with CARs.

In order to keep Pakistan bridled, the US coined 'do more mantra', kept leveling unsubstantiated allegations, resorted to coercive diplomacy and subjected it to drone strikes. It made Pakistan a convenient scapegoat to hide its failures. Pak-US relations, which remained lukewarm because of bossy and mistrustful attitude of American officials and their outright leaning toward India and Afghanistan, nosedived after the incidents of Raymond Davis in January 2011, stealth attack in Abbottabad on 2 May, Admiral Mullen's diatribe in September describing Haqqani network as the 'veritable arm' of ISI, and brutal Salala attack on 26 November. In utter frustration, Pakistan was forced to close Shamsi airbase, block NATO supply routes for over seven months and cease military cooperation. These steps meant to impress upon the US to respect Pakistan's sovereignty and to treat Pakistan as an ally rather than a target further widened the trust gap and brought Pak-US relations to a near-breaking point.

Fighting the US dictated war on terror has had debilitating impact on Pakistan's social, political and economic life. Strikes by CIA operated drones and US meddling in domestic affairs has resulted in gradual erosion of Pakistan's sovereignty and honor. Despite suffering the most in terms of human casualties and economic losses, the US prefers India over Pakistan. While the US keeps prodding Pakistan to befriend India and not to treat it as arch enemy, it doesn't press India to bring a change in its belligerent attitude and hegemonic policies and to lower its ever increasing defence budget each year. The US asks Pakistan to shift additional formations from the east to the west without realizing that India never misses an opportunity to harm Pakistan. The US and Israel have been constantly helping India to improve its economic, military and nuclear strengths and are responsible for disturbing the regional military balance of power. Rewards have been generously doled out in complete disregard of India's ambitions and dangerous designs against Pakistan.

India has constructed 40 dams over the three rivers flowing into Pakistan to turn its fertile lands arid but no concern has been expressed by USA or any western country. The US is least interested in finding an amicable solution to the 65 year old Kashmir dispute since any facilitation in this direction will annoy India. The US fails to comprehend that when it lectures on Indo-Pak amity, until and unless right of self-determination is given to the Kashmiris and water aggression by India is reversed, meaningful goodwill cannot be promoted between the two antagonists.

In the wake of security situation in Afghanistan spinning out of control of US-NATO- forces despite the two US troops surges, depleting US economy and increasing home pressure to end the unwinnable war, the US initiated a political prong to induce the Taliban to negotiate for a political settlement. This initiative enhanced Pakistan's importance and in order to lure Pakistan to help in convincing the hard-line Taliban leaders, the process of strategic dialogue was started in 2010 which provides a platform to both Pakistan and the US to convey their expectations and demands. The main purpose behind the Pak-US strategic dialogue was to understand and address the interests and concerns of each other. The US interest was to find a way for a safe and honorable exit from Afghanistan with Pakistan's assistance. Pakistan on the other hand was mainly interested in US assistance to improve its faltering economy, overcome its energy crisis and to address its military imbalances.

Pakistan has been seeking a civil nuclear deal like the one US concluded with India and consider it imperative for restoring balance in the region. It wants this agreement to overcome the energy crisis it is facing. Pakistan wants to have a balanced relationship with the US and not a discriminatory one. It expects from the US to restrain rather than encourage Indian meddlesome role in Pakistan using Afghan soil. Pakistan was not given an improved US trade access for its textile exports. It is crucial for Pakistan's economy to restore its declining industrial sector through trade access which is more effective than aid.

The US has been making tall promises but has failed to deliver. Pakistan didn't receive from the US the support it expected over its national security concerns. Rather, it squeezed Pakistan by stopping the payment of committed aid installments and even withheld $1.2 billion which it had to pay against CSF for services rendered by Pak Army. Pakistan's request for a free trade agreement has not been ceded to. The Reconstruction Opportunity Zones (ROZ) legislation that would give market access and trade concessions to Pakistan and Enterprise Fund Projects and construction of two hydro electric dams in FATA are still pending. As against total $ 18 billion Pakistan received from the US since 2002, it lost $70 billion in fighting the war on terror. Human losses have crossed the figure of 35000. 5000 fatalities suffered by Pakistan law enforcement agencies are far more than the casualties suffered by 48 countries involved in war on terror.

With the continuously worsening situation in Afghanistan and setbacks at home for the US administration, Pakistan's geo-strategic position in the region has once again presented hope for players engaged in Afghanistan. Indications are that the only reason that the US has so far not abandoned Pakistan is that it has lost the war in Afghanistan and its safe and honorable exit is to a large extent dependent upon Pakistan. Another reason is the breakdown in US-Taliban parleys which has placed the US in an awkward position. It has no roadmap for its safe exit and future stability of the region. It is pinning hopes on Pakistan to convince the Taliban to resume talks for a negotiated political settlement. However, despite knowing that Pakistan is the only country that can play a key role in solving Afghan tangle, the US wants to keep Pakistan out and India within its loop.

Pakistan has already ceded lot of ground without extracting anything in return. America's efforts to give enhanced role to India in Afghanistan and to pressure Pakistan to grant land access to India via Wagah should be firmly resisted. Concessions should be reciprocal and not unilateral.



The writer is a retired Brig and a defence and security analyst. Email: asifharoon7751@yahoo.com

Reader Comments:

Reality of Pakistan

Dear, it'd be better if you add the contents of "blood telegram" in yours article. Why not to show the real face of Pakistan.

Imran Ali, - 06 November, 2012

good

You write good. Have you been writing all life?

Munaf, - 06 November, 2012

Amazing Article

Sums it up very nicely sir. Salute to you

Mustafa M.

Mustafa M, Canada - 06 November, 2012

i believe there is lot of truth in this story,however one has to lookat two sides subjectively,as clinton once said
two wrongs do,t make a right,so is the case with both the countries ,lack of trust,lack of communication and over and above lack of transperancy. Pakistan suffers from weak foreighn policy.and should be more firm to protect
its interests.Also US and other allied countries should help pakistan ,in field of education .specially in north west
frontier of pakistan,where the terroism is at peak. Finally each country has to take a moderate approach to solve
its problems,Pakistan should reasearch on the US policy as to why us behaved in this way,may be partly it is
reaction, or fear of unknown only god knows ,i only believe that god created this earth for everybody to live in harmony,and we all should not try to up set the balance of nature.

mohammed, United Kingdom - 06 November, 2012

Why?

Why? Why has America done this to you? After all they have provided for you for the last 65 years and they still provide for you. So, why do you think that they have started to mistrust you? Can you think of a reason? You blame them (and everyone else) for everything that has gone wrong in your country. You don't have a singe kind word for them in your propaganda. And, you demand that they keep on providing for you. The only time we heard any positive comments coming out of your kind was when the USA threatened to stop all aid to your "rich" country. You have made a choice. You have sided with China, so why beg from the US? And, the astonishing thing is that the US keep on providing for your kind. Alas! When will they learn? It will be interesting to see how your friends Saudi Arabia and China treat you once the USA dumps you. After all you are an Islamic nation which supports the communist regime of China. Is it any wonder that even Saudi Arabia has started to shun you.

Good luck, Smart ones. You deserve what is happening to your nation. And, you deserve what is in store for you.

Arvalikuminbem Bidoena, - 08 November, 2012

Every country esp non Muslim countries prefer their interest over others!

Waging war is for business.Doing joint military excercises is to sell high tech war gears to the less advanced military.Slogans of Human rights,fairness,women rights,women education ,child labour are all used to exert pressure on the disobedient govt.Otherwise US goes in love with the worlds' most brutal regime.Now US and Myanmar are going to do joint military excercises.Why don't Pakistani military not understand this?Are they so stupid?

AB, - 08 November, 2012

Comprehensive Analysis

sir your article gives vivid analytic approach to the matter. i would like to conclude your article with the comments that generally there is permanent foe and friend in international politics but it is particularly present in the case of Pak-US relationship. but time has come pak leadership must rose to the occasion to handle the American lobby and make them realize and complete to respect the sovereignty of Pakistan. on the other hand if common masses take matter in their hands the situation would be bad to worse and neither india nor america would be able to think to affect national integration !

Muhammad Nadeem Jalbani, Pakistan - 27 January, 2013

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Imran - Qadri long march
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Speaker Ayaz Sadiq has only 25 PTI resignations
ANP fighting for parliament, not PM: Asfandyar
Suggested Sites