Pakistan News Service

Thursday Jul 18, 2019, Zul-qaadah 15, 1440 Hijri
Logo
LATEST :

Musharraf’s worries

30 October, 2006

By Muhammad Ahsan Yatu


  Related News  
Musharraf's lawyers 'threatened with beheading'
Court rejects Musharraf's plea for military trial; summoned on 11th
  Related Articles  
Musharraf Should be Pardoned
By Saeed Qureshi
Musharraf's Indictment and the Related Questions
By Saeed Qureshi
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

"Quaid-e-Azam's Pakistan will be dead if the extremists win," so said President Musharraf. Communication these days is a mixture of hope and despair. Judging from the recent statements of the president, the good news is that elections will be held on the due date or before. And the bad news is that the president is worried. His statements tell a bit more, and that is horrifying. He says the Quaid's Pakistan will be dead in case the extremists win the elections. The president's worries do not appeal to many observers. Their assessment is that the extremists have not acquired so far the kind of clout that would win them countrywide electoral support. Yet, the justifications for and against the president's worries could be established only by debating various scenarios that may emerge before or after the elections.

 

If the situation remains as it is now, the coming elections will not change anything radically. The PML (Q) in the absence of Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif and in the presence of the 'uniform' will win more seats in spite of the fact that there are not many Pakistanis around who have affinity with it. Yet, it is a political party and is in power also. It is in fact a party of stalwarts and that is a great advantage. What else have we strengthened in Pakistan other than the generals, the administrators, the rich, the stalwarts and the extremists? The PPP will emerge as the second largest parliamentary party, but with reduced seats, and the MQM will maintain its ethnic support base.

 

In Balochistan, pre-poll, during the poll and post-poll rigging cannot be ruled out. The forces in control would like to prove that they were right in taking action against the 'rebels', because the people in general wanted so. (It is interesting to point out here that a retired general wrote in his book that Bhutto was hanged on public demand.) The MMA if left alone will not be able to maintain its previous performance, in spite of an unprecedented increase in religious extremism. However, it can emerge much, much stronger than before, if the invisible hands continue to help it. The nationalists will win a few more seats in the NWFP. The gist of the first scenario is that the major parties in the election will be the PPP, the PML (Q) and the MMA. There is a possibility that the MMA and the PML (Q) may enter into an unwritten alliance, as they did in the 2002 elections.

 

What if the PML (Q) and the PPP join hands? If things remain calm, they will win more seats and form the government with a comfortable majority, but the alliance will lead to polarisation. The PML (N) and the MMA will come closer, of course, with the blessings of those who matter, and that will destabilise the situation before or after the elections. And eventually, no one will be able to stop the extremists from coming into power through elections or through rebellion.

 

What if the PML (N) and the PPP form an alliance? Both will reduce their seats, particularly in Punjab, because anti-PPP voters and the extremists will vote for the PML (Q) candidates where needed. What if the PPP, the PML (N) and the MMA form an electoral alliance? The PML (Q) will still win as many seats as before. If the alliance of the trio continues, a destabilisation campaign will begin just after the elections and that will lead to the eventual rise to power of extremists.

 

If Nawaz Sharif and Benazir come back the scenario will certainly change, and so will the alliances. The PML (N)-MMA alliance will win most of Punjab and NWFP. In case the PML (N) and the PPP coordinate, the PPP will get more seats provided the PML (Q) stalwarts do not return to the PML (N) fold, which is likely if the president sheds his uniform. In solo flights too, the PPP will win more seats than before. In case the PPP and the PML (Q) form an alliance, the results will again depend on the uniform. If the president chooses a civilian role before the elections, the PML (N) alone will win most seats in Punjab, and its alliance with the MMA will win NWFP.

 

What if Benazir Bhutto returns and Nawaz Sharif stays back? The PML (N) will be the net loser. The PPP and the PML (Q) will win most seats with or without forming an alliance. The MMA will either go for the elections alone or if directed will form an alliance with the PML (N). In the latter case, polarisation will begin, leading to destabilisation and eventually to the victory of extremism.

 

In all the discussed scenarios, we find that the 'uniform', extremism, the invisible hands and opportunism are the factors that will determine the shape of future politics and hence of Pakistan. Politics of meaningful policies and the commitment with the nation are absent from all these scenarios, whereas the mechanism for growth of extremism exists and is dominant also. Musharraf's worries do have legs.

 

No one could predict victory for the MMA in two provinces. No one could predict even the formation of the MMA. Yet it happened. The situation can take a further and better turn for the MMA. It can expand its capacity to win much more seats in Punjab and Sindh also. It may not be able to form its governments there, but it will seek a partnership from a position of strength. Things have certainly developed to such an extent and there are reasons for it.

 

President Musharraf knows the reasons well. All those state actors and agencies that helped in the creation of the MMA and also in its victory afterwards are still supporting it, rather with much more sincerity and vigour. The MMA components were loyalists ever since their equation with the army and the civil administration developed. The MMA as an entity proved not only loyal but also much more beneficial. Thus, it was rewarded with more than what it used to get before. The agreement between the Taliban of Waziristan and the Government of Pakistan is the latest example. It is like creating a country within a country.

 

Through its governments in NWFP and Balochistan, the MMA might not have added much to its basic vote base, but it has certainly strengthened its support base among the influentials as well as in the equation. Those who are aware of election skills know that the support base is the key to victory. It will help them win the elections that are still far away; its results as of today are unprecedented and evident in the unchecked rise of religious extremism everywhere in Pakistan and even outside Pakistan.

 

The Taliban are active again in Afghanistan. If the Afghanistan experiment fails or comes under threat, our love of democracy will either end or come under stress. Afghan anti-democracy forces and ours have many things in common. Their success or even near-success in Afghanistan will also affect us. Three possibilities will shape the future. A new and independent political dynamic may emerge and that may try to tear apart whatever social fabric we wear. The other possibility is the military's pre-emptive intervention to stop it from happening. Yet another possibility is fulfilment of a vision in totality: the Waziristan arrangement is a trailer, the rest is to follow.

 

How to save the rest of Pakistan? The only way out is if an alliance of the PPP, PML (Q), PML (N), MQM and PONAM is formed, provincial autonomy as demanded by the smaller provinces is granted, relations with India are improved without core conditions attached, sincerity towards the Afghan government is shown by deeds and not merely by words, the budget allocations are diverted from defence to development, the army and administration turn to their constitutionally assigned jobs, foreign policy is revised to return to the real world from a fantasy called the Muslim world; and before all this is done, President Musharraf convinces the elite and the men in uniform that if the Quaid's Pakistan is dead, they too will have a terrible time.

 

The means and methods explained will not check the unprecedented rise of religious extremism immediately. It will take time, maybe a couple of decades or even more, but slowly and steadily we will again become normal. In case institutional interests, extremism, opportunism and fantasies continue to dominate political scenarios, then there is no way out but to pray for NATO success and start Talbanising our lifestyles also: Better 'red' than 'dead'. Whatever the future, democracy or theocracy, the Talbanised will remain the favourites.

 

Seven years of his rule did not improve much in Pakistan, but it has helped President Musharraf to attain political maturity in some critical affairs. His apprehension that the Quaid's Pakistan will be dead in case extremists win elections has a rationale, both empirical as well as informative. He deserves a matching response.

 

End.

Reader Comments:

RARE BREED...

Yes, our obstacles are insurmountable, the question that begs asking is if not him WHO? And far and wide on the horizon, exists nary a cavalier who could steer us thru these jarring and tumultous times that Pakistan is currently going thru. We as a nation, find ourselves at our most historical cross roads. I am ALL for democracy, in fact I'll wager saying that to our cost, we are behind the curve on that one, but replacing him will be like putting the cart before the horse. He is showing us how to walk, so that later we may be propelled by this improving momentum and start to run of our own volition. Make no mistake my friends, this is the ONLY leader Pakistan has produced for whom not just the Christians, but also the Jews and Hindus are praying - unprecedented!

N. JAVED, United Kingdom - 31 October, 2006

Quaid's Pakistan?

Before we use the term QUaid's Pakistan we should think and ask ourself would he have been happy with the military dictatorship which has caused Pakistan to loose lands in all the battles,would he have been happy to see the crime and corruption? WHy then we don't speak?


Dr.M.Khan, United Kingdom - 01 November, 2006

Jews and christians Praying for Musharraf

Mr or Ms.Javed has brought up a very true fact that Jews and christians are praying for Musharraf.
Late Ariel Sharon said on Amrican TV in joint interview with Collin Powell that before going to bed he prays for the safety of Musharraf!
Also Condilica Rice and Bush said recently they can't even imagine a Pakistan without Musharraf.
Well, history will tell us afterwards as we know now that Ayub Khan was on payroll of CIA and got $200,000 per year until death.He must have offered some services to USA to get the money equal to the salary of US president in white house then.But what did he do to qualify this,is the work of Pakistani academia,intllegentsia and think tanks.
What is good for Pakistanis may not be good for Indians,or Americans or Russians and vice versa. Yes, it is the mentality of the dictators and their supporters that he is more important than the country or whole nation and this is a dangerous thinking and deserves to be abandoned.Coutnries and nations are and must be superior than the leaders who come and go.
Today, why the Govt's priority is not working to eradicate corruption,reduce crime?It can be done. Increase number of Police force,Increase their salaries and set up a transparent system of promotions based on merit,and you could see the results in one to two years.But a Govt which is religously carrying out the agenda of USA because the generals go to USA for training and know full well that the medals and high performance certificates are given not to those who do better but who can profess US agenda, well documented in "Constant conflict"by Maj Ralph Peters on www.informationclearinghouse.info

Dr.M.Khan, United Kingdom - 02 November, 2006

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites