Pakistan News Service

Wednesday Apr 23, 2014, Jumada-al-thani 22, 1435 Hijri
Logo Logo
LATEST :

Moderation and Pakistan

29 February, 2012

By Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)


  Related News  
Human cloning, change in gender un-Islamic: CII
The Veil & Islam
  Related Articles  
Irresponsible Statements of Religious Leaders
By Zaheerul Hassan
Sharpening secular-Islamic divide in Pakistan
By Asif Haroon Raja
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

It requires larger than a man to admit one's follies. Let's try as a nation to rise to those heights and confess that we did err in "over-Islamising" Pakistan and that too quite unwarrantedly. This has unfortunately given birth to religious polarisation and sectarianism tearing at the very fibre of our national unity. There was no need for it at all. We were Muslims before and would remain Muslims ever, come what may. In that we are also Shias, Sunnis, Hanfis, Shaafis, Malikis, Hambalis, Deobandis, Breillevis, Ahl-e-Hadis, Wahabis, Zikris, Bhais, Bohras, Agha Khanis, etcetra, and will remain so always. No amount of persuasion or persecution will make anyone change his/her beliefs or religious practices and rituals that one has been following since childhood. Why surfaces these trivialities now which were never a subject of discussion or dissension before? I am talking of the pre-Pakistan period. Everyone was leading a life of harmony alongside with others. Muharram, which has now become the most contentious and polarising issue used to be solemnised by all with equal reverence and solemnity. In most cities of the pre-partitioned India Sunnis' Tazias were at times larger and more beautifully made than those of Shias. Even Hindus were seen putting up Sabeels in Lahore and other cities on the Muharram processions' routes.

Here in Pakistan too every thing was fine, displaying the spirit of tolerance and cordiality. Then, in 1977 ZAB rigged the elections and was in no mood to oblige the opposition parties by holding the re-elections. The parleys between the two protracted for months and the undercurrents of the general unrest in the country started surfacing here and there. Opposition mostly comprising of Islam Pasand parties (Nau Sitaray) found it most opportune to rally the masses under the banner of Islam against Bhutto otherwise known for his secular and socialistic modern views in the orthodox circles. Agar thori si pi laita hoon to kisi ka khoon to nahin peeta. (If I drink a little, I don't drink anyone's blood). What could be a better slogan than Nizam-e-Mustafa to get to the hearts of the naïve masses? Though the whole scheme of affairs was a political ploy than a sincere effort to serve the cause of Islam, yet it worked. However, at the same time it sowed the

seeds of suspicion in the mind of the Muslim minorities as to which Nizam-e-Mustafa would be imposed upon them. Echoes of "Nizam-e-Mustafa laikin Intizam-e-Murtaza" type of slogans soon started reverberating all over the country. Though the Nizam-e-Mustafa movement faded out after a while, yet the sectarian aftermath left behind by it haunts us till today. Innumerable sectarian organisations and Lashkars sprang up all over, some with clear-cut manifestos of decreeing the opponents as Kafir and Wajabul Qatal. Bhutto gone and Zia coming gave further impetus to the Islam pasand parties and the process of Islamisation of Pakistan gained further momentum. The last nail in the coffin of the enlightened moderation was driven by the rise and fall of Taliban in the neighbouring Afghanistan and its spill over in the bordering provinces of NWFP and Baluchistan, whose sizeable Pathan population resides in places as far as Karachi spreading the germs of extremism and sectarianism in those places as well.

The Islamisation trend is imperceptibly making inroads in our all walks of life. The younger generation who has no knowledge of our Indian past is being brainwashed unwittingly. The so called intellectuals feel it their patriotic duty to not only rewrite the history but also encourage us to divest ourselves altogether from our pre-partitioned past to the comical extent of even denying ourselves the pleasure of listening to the pre-1947 songs like Awaz day kahan hai – Duniya meri jawan hai and thousands more like it sung by the artistes born, bred and buried in what is now Pakistan! But since they sang these songs in the pre-partitioned days of India, we disown them. We refuse to do anything with the Purshpura of the past (Peshawar) the capital of emperor Kinishka or try to remember it as the most beautiful city of the flowers of its time. We have Takushilla (Taxilla) but hardly visit its ruins and stupas or take pride in the fact that once upon a time it was the largest seat of leaning in the world. We take off at a tangent from the day Muhammad bin Qasim landed in Sindh and tag ourselves as an unidentified appendage to the Islamic – nay - Arabian history and heritage. Unfortunately, our Arabian heritage also stops dead at 600 AD and we know nothing of its pre-Islamic period. We just ignore it and divest ourselves from it by calling it Zamana-e-Jahliat.

Jahliat or whatever, there must have been people living there in some form of society and being governed by some system. There must have been noblemen, chieftains, kings, rulers, men and women of distinction to have left some mark on the Arabian peninsula. When there were significant and highly developed civilizations in the region and around like that of ancient Babylon (Iraq and Mesopotamia) with its hanging gardens, Damascus of Syria – the most ancient city of the world, the Pharaohs and Cleopatra (Egypt, Sudan and Nile) with their pyramids and sea going flotillas, Syracuse, Darius, Nowsherwan-e-Adil (Iran–Persia) with their rich culture and literature, going thousands of years back, why do we stop at the dawn of Islam in Arabia and do not wish to know or try to research our any past there? Or, is it because that Emperor Bikramajit of Hindustan wielded some influence over the Arva-sathan (land of the horses), which with the passage of time and due to the South Indians' pronouncing 'v' as 'b' got transformed into Arbistan (Arabia). A horse is called 'arva' in Sansikrit and Sathan is the 'place' as Paki-stan, Afghani-stan etc. or as in Punjabi 'thaan'. Otherwise too historically there were strong ties between the Hind, Hindis and the Brahmins and the pre/post-Islamic Arabia. Holy Prophet (PBUH) is said to have been treated by a Hindi Tabeeb. Imam Hussain asked for going to Hind as one of the negotiating terms with Yazid at Karbala. Husaini Bahmins (Brahmins) are found in India even today, who observe Muharram fervently each year and correctly in the month of Asadh (Hahd).

Agreed, Muslims had little future in the independent India, particularly after the British departed from the scene. Therefore, Quaid ably aided by Iqbal did them a great favour by carving out a separate homeland for them, which offered them vast economic opportunities. However, Pakistan was not created to be an orthodox religious state, which unfortunately the present creed of the politico-religious parties is trying to make it. Father of the nation wanted it to be a dynamic and progressive country wherein the principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice as enunciated by Islam shall be fully observed. Wherein adequate provision shall be made for the minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures. Wherein we shall not kill each other on the basis of sect or religion and shall observe Enlightened Moderation in our all-mutual dealings. Let's, therefore, rise to the occasion and try as a nation to make Quaid's dream of real Pakistan come true.

End.

Reader Comments:

WOW !

WOW ! What a thought provoking article !!

Nagaraj, India - 20 April, 2012

The leaned author says : “We were Muslims before and would remain Muslims ever, come what may. In that we are also Shias, Sunnis, Hanfis, Shaafis, Malikis, Hambalis, Deobandis, Breillevis, Ahl-e-Hadis, Wahabis, Zikris, Bhais, Bohras, Agha Khanis, etcetra, and will remain so always.” However, Allah says in the Holy Quran “"As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou has no part in them in the least...." (6:159). The lesson here is just after the death of the Holy Prophet, Muslim Ummah divided into two groups and today in many groups against the command of Allah yet we call ourselves Muslims. May Allah forgive us.

Mustafa, - 14 May, 2012

Further to my previous post I wish to say that the Holy Prophet was neither Shia nor Sunni nor he belonged to any firqa. He was Muslim. Therefore, we are supposed to be just Muslims, not Shia, Sunni, Wahabi etc. etc.

Mustafa, - 14 May, 2012

Pakistan has certainly not happened along the lines charted by its founding fathers. I do not understand why you say muslims had no future
in independence India. The nation you mention above along Islamic lines with acceptance of minorities exists in much better form in india. We have islamic / muslim nuclear scientists, heading the nation, I studied from Maulana Azad Medical college and when our prime minister indra gandhi faced certain and first defeat in 1977, she did not invite army to help her but faced elections. I do not understand why you say Muslims had no future in india. On the balance muslims are better in India than any other nation including Pak which shunned principals of democracy, and religious tolerance unfortunately. A pakistan along the lines set by Jinnah would certainly have been much better but the gamble undertook to save muslim minority interests in a combined independent India backfired unfortunately. All muslims had a much better future under one nation. Let us all be human first and then be Muslims or any religion.

ls, United States - 01 June, 2012

like article on the balance

ls, United States - 01 June, 2012

COL RIAZ JAFRI has indeed in this article been extremely moderate and liberal with regard to his views and opinions. What most appeals to a reader like me who is from India is that the writer has tried to express the apprehensions of the Indian Muslims at the time of Independence with regard to their future in India but, at the same time has given regard and appreciation to the Indian culture that has existed since the last three thousand years. The reference to Taxila and the Buddhist culture of the ancient times that had been existing on that part of the Indian subcontinent that is now Pakistan and the emphasis to revisit it is indeed a thought most positive and encouraging. It is true that the past with regard to Indo-Pak relations has not been very cordial but, the present is apparently gives an indication of a turn towards a cordial and cogenial relationship. The three fratricidal wars between the two neighbours and the intrusion in Kargil have cause a damage with regard to trust and the fabric of relationship has suffered damage. There time now is that both sides India and Pakistan accept that there have been certain diplomatic moves not very cordial in the past and now the two sides must refrain from such acts and exercise restraint whenever the situation turns provocative. Pakistan and India both must get closer and shed the antipathy and distrust that the two neighbours have shared since independence. The question really is that how far the Indo-Pak human resource potential can be garnered and harnessed in a manner that proves beneficial to the two neighbours and to ASIA. After all India and Pakistan are a part of the Asian Fraternity and as 'Asian Brothers' the time has come that we abjure the path of confrontation and turn cooperative. Thus there can be peace in South Asia and this will be the beginning of the creation of an ASIAN CONFEDERATION.

MANOJ JOSHI, India - 01 June, 2012

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
 
 
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Artilce 6 and Musharraf Trail
Blocking Nato supply line
  Quick Vote Show Results
Question: "In view of the current situation do you think Talks with Taliban should take place only within the ambit of Article 4 of Objectives Resolution that defines our Common Purpose i.e. PM/ President down to all Pakistanis to work till we achieve the rights of Democracy, Freedom, Tolerance and Social Justice for all Pakistanis:"
Yes
No
 
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Drone kills 15 'Qaeda', three civilians in Yemen: security
Senior journalist Hamid Mir hurt in Karachi attack
Suggested Sites