Pakistan News Service

Monday Sep 16, 2019, Muharram 16, 1441 Hijri

India, Pakistan, Kashmir and Arms Race

30 April, 2012

By Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai

  Related News  
Pakistan intends to resolve all issues with India through dialogue: Jilani
Pakistan, India decide to allow greater trade through Wagah
  Related Articles  
Line out of control?
By Yasmeen Aftab Ali
Not so fast
By Asif Ezdi
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All
  Related News Poll

'The Christian Science Monitor' in its column on April 25, 2012 said it all by saying that "Ritual Aggression: India and Pakistan's missile tests, following peace talks."

We know that both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Both have now tested intercontinental ballistic missiles. Both are adamant against inking the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty or the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Both feature domestic constituencies that universally celebrate their muscular nuclear postures; no political party or serious private association champions nuclear controls or disarmament. India and Pakistan have warred three times since their respective births in 1947, and two occasioned on the disputed territory of Kashmir. In the best of times, India and Pakistan are no more friendlier than the Montagues and Capulets on the streets of Verona.

Two not mutually exclusive approaches are available to the United States to turn back the nuclear clock in South Asia; a region that former President Clinton has lamented is the most dangerous place on the planet. The first emphasizes restraints on nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles; the second gives primacy to eliminating the probable cause of nuclear exchanges. The US has chosen the first, and given but lip service to the second.

All experience teaches that neither India nor Pakistan will accept non-trivial limits on their nuclear arsenals in the foreseeable future. India's intransigent position for more than 44 years is no nuclear constraints unless every nation abandons its nuclear forces and stockpiles, including the big five nuclear powers under the NPT: the United States, Russia, China, Great Britain, and France. India has now tested intercontinental ballistic missiles that could deliver nuclear warheads to the Beijing and Shanghai. The United States did not say anything that gives cause for Indian military anxieties. India's nuclear and missile fixation pivots on her national ambitions and self-perception as the hegemonistic power in South Asia she routinely meddles in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and the Maldives, and annexed Goa in 1961 and the Kingdom of Sikkim in 1975 by force of arms. Thus, nothing but an overwhelming nuclear disarmament incentive could cause India to entertain the idea. At present, such an incentive is chimerical.

According to the United Nations, Kashmir is a disputed territory. When the Kashmir question got erupted at the UN in 1948, the world powers took the stand that the future of Kashmir must be ascertained through plebiscite conducted by the United Nations. India's plebiscite obligation has been defied with both insolence and impunity for more than half a century, which substantially explains the chronic convulsions and ubiquitous indigenous Kashmiri resistance to India's illegal military occupation. Contrary to popular myth, cleverly peddled by India, the resistance in Kashmir is indigenous & popular; and infiltrators or terrorist "Afghan Arabs" are marginal to the Kashmir conflict.

The nuclear clock in South Asia thus can be turned back only by addressing the source of the proliferation, i.e., Kashmir. If the 65-year-old Kashmir conflict is settled with fairness and justice to all parties, then the possession of nuclear weapons by India and Pakistan will be dramatically less worrisome. Britain and France, for instance, do not fret that the other is a nuclear power. And the United States and Russia are engaged in serious nuclear arms reductions, but it came only after the end of the Cold War. In sum, Kashmir is the key to spiking the nuclear arms race in South Asia.

I do not mean to suggest, however, that tackling Kashmir will not be difficult. But here are my thoughts about a new and promising approach.

First, recognize that Kashmir is primarily about the 17 million Kashmiri people, their human rights and right to self-determination under international law and still binding United Nations Security Council resolutions. It is not a border quarrel between India and Pakistan, nor is it a fight between Hindus and Muslims.

Second, third party intervention and mediation is indispensable. India and Pakistan have negotiated for 65 years without result. All the flowery declarations from Tashkent, Simla, Lahore and other summits have proven sound and fury signifying nothing. To persist in the same course after 65 years of dismal failure conjures up many adjectives, but none are flattering to the cerebral faculty.

Third, the United States should urge the Secretary General of the United Nations, Ban Ki-Moon to appoint a epical envoy on Kashmir. More importantly, the United States should insist on the inclusion of genuine representatives of the Kashmiri people at the negotiating table. It is their political destiny and human rights which are at stake, and no solution that fails to command their consent will endure. That same reasoning explains the United States support for Sinn Fein representatives in the Northern Ireland talks, PLO representatives in talks with Israel, East Timor voices in negotiations with Indonesia, KLA leaders in negotiations with Yugoslavia, and Muslim, Croat, and Serb politicians in discussions over Bosnia.

Fourth, the United States should mount a campaign of moral suasion against India's illegal occupation of Kashmir. At present, its moral voice has been as silent as the Sphinx. Moral suasion generally works slowly, but is not Pollyannaish. It accelerated South Africa's dismantling of apartheid and the end of the international slave trade. It promises no miracle in South Asia, but is nevertheless superior to all other peace and non-proliferation alternatives.

Finally, all tactics aiming at progress over Kashmir must be exercised with supreme prudence, without which, as the inimitable Sam Johnson sermonized, knowledge is useless, wit ridiculous, and genius contemptible.

Dr. Fai can be reached at:

Reader Comments:

Keep dreaming Dr.Fai. Your wishes will be sand in your grave.

Alex, - 30 April, 2012

Writing from Jail

This liar is sitting in jail and writing nonsense. No country can force India to do want the Porkis and this convicted criminal wants.

Tom, - 30 April, 2012

The author's desperate attempt to rope in US... reveals porkistan's weak standing of ever being able to face up to india....but sadly the hopes of resolving kashmir will never materialize until pakistan compensates for decades of terrorism against until the india feels charitable kashmir will be ours...which will be foreover...because india tolerates but never forgets...

as for trying to get US to mediate....its not going to happen until it has China to contend dream on!

xxx, - 01 May, 2012

Dr Fai, I thought you were jailed for spying for ISI in USA?

Dr Fai, I thought you were jailed for spying for ISI in USA?

Sudip verma, Singapore - 03 May, 2012

Such one-sided views will never help solve the problem of Kashmir!

Shankar, India - 04 May, 2012

Well written Dr Fai

Pakistan has bigger nuclear arsenal than India has and Indians have to learn to respect the Paks. And atop, China with 10 to 1 edge in economy over India is walking hands in hands with Pak. China's nuclear arsenal is 20 times bigger than India's.

Indians have to learn a lot in walking on peace path instead of doing useless insulting remarks on Paks. Who the hell cares when Indian dogs bark and shit slurs against Paks. No one cares about useless Indian dogs. Perhaps they are trying to lessen the regress of their dog being by calling slurrs to grand Paks.

Dogs will remain dogs and that is what Indians are. Paks are Paks and with China as friend they dominate Asia as grand humans.

Even the Indian human photos make them look like bone skin beggars. Just look at their pictures. Paks look handsome and pretty in pictures walking around in Lahore, Peshawar, Islamabad, Karachi and other cities.

God bless China Pak-- the grandest pair of Asia.

A.M Rogers, Canada - 05 May, 2012


This Fai has got his dues from ISI recently to write this article. Why Pakistan is concerned about Kashmir which is not a part of Pakistan if not India. If Pakistan takes up the issue of Kashmir at international levels, what is obstructing India to take up Balochistan and KP areas. Do Mr.Fai know the pre-conditions imposed to conduct plebiscite in Kashmir that Pak should withdraw its troops and government machinery from that area first. Meanwhile we pray for the souls of Pakistan soldiers died in Siachen because of negligence of Pakistan Army top officials who could not retrieve even a single body even after one month of the accident.

Sowrabh Sushil, India - 06 May, 2012

what about POK? you dont wright anything about it? It is illegal occupation by Pakistan.why you donate part of Kasmir to china? Please justify.No One trust on Pakistan Bugal!!!!!

Amar, Kenya - 06 May, 2012

What about Tibet and Xinxiang

Why is Pakistan quiet about tibet and xinxiang where China is settling han chinese? India must be praised for not altering kashmiri demographics in 60 years..

gus, United States - 09 September, 2012

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites