Pakistan News Service

Tuesday Jan 28, 2020, Jumada-al-thani 2, 1441 Hijri

Hydrocarbon Law for Dummies

30 March, 2007

By Anwaar Hussain

Bushs Middle East think tank
  Related News  
Britain to cut Iraq troop levels
More than 100 court martials for mistreatment in Iraq, Afghanistan: US
  Related Speakout  
  More on this View All

Iraqi Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi, who was in Japan last week for a four-day official visit, says U.S.-led coalition forces should be able to withdraw from his country in a year and half at the latest, a Japanese newspaper reported on Saturday.

“Personally, I think Iraqi security forces will complete reforms and training in a year or a year and a half. After that, the coalition troops will no longer be needed.” Hashemi was quoted as saying.

No longer needed, huh! Personally, I think that the Iraqi Vice President’s IQ and shoe size are about the same.

One hates to puncture the heartwarming, optimistic naivete of the Iraqi Vice President but the truth is that the U.S.-led coalition forces are not going any where, not for the next about 30 years at the minimum.

How, pray, has the scribe arrived at this conclusion, one may ask.

That, sirs, is a no-brainer. Read on.

Invisible in the smoke screen of civil war in Iraq, the current US ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad has been working feverishly on Iraq’s first post-invasion Hydrocarbon Law.

The fancy name not withstanding, the law is simply about Iraq’s 112 billion barrels of proven, close to the surface and easily extractable oil reserves, the second largest in the world after Saudi Arabia, along with roughly 220 billion barrels of other probable and possible resources. Add to this another fact of equal importance. Iraq’s true potential is said to be far greater than this as the country has remained relatively unexplored due to years of war and sanctions.

The above mentioned two facts alone require an on-station presence of decades of some if not all four of the western oil giants i.e. Exxon, Chevron, Shell and BP.

Simple thus far, eh? Let us proceed onwards.

Khalilzad’s untiring efforts were rewarded recently by the passing of the proposed law by the puppet Iraqi government. The lolly in the law is hidden in some of its provisions that are said to be a “radical departure from the norm for developing countries”. And that is that under the new law oil majors such as BP and Shell in Britain, and Exxon and Chevron in the US, would be able to sign deals of up to 30 years to extract Iraq’s oil, a kind of contract which other oil producing countries do not want to touch by a mile long pole.

Zalmay Khalilzad is an interesting character. One recalls that Khalilzad was once an advisor to Unocal (Union Oil Company of California). A diehard Neocon, he keeps getting sent to places where the oil scent is up in the air. He was appointed as a special envoy to Afghanistan immediately after the invasion and occupation of that country along with another ex-employee of Unocal, Hamid Karzai. Karzai, though, made it to the President of that same country.

Together they drew up a risk analysis of a proposed gas pipeline from the former Soviet republic of Turkmenistan across Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Indian Ocean. Previously too Khalilzad had participated in similar talks between Unocal and Taliban officials in 1997. What is relatively unknown is that while that project remained a ‘pipe dream’, Unocal quietly merged with Chevron Corporation on August 10, 2005, and became a wholly owned subsidiary.

So the gist of the story so far is that Iraq’s Hydrocarbon Law, passed recently by a weak Iraqi government, gives long term concessions to Western oil giants, among them not just Khalilzad’s but many Neocons’ former employers. These oil giants, however, cannot operate on their own in Iraq and need protection from ‘overzealous’ national and regional forces that tend to unbalance the gravy train.

That brings us to Anwaar’s First Universal Law of Hydrocarbon. It states, “Hydrocarbon at rest tends to stay at rest and Hydrocarbon in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by unbalancing forces.”

Something clearly needed to be done regarding the unbalancing forces.

Now here is a map of Iraq oil fields turned over by the Commerce Department, under a March 5, 2002 court order as a result of Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit concerning the activities of the Dick Cheney’s Energy Task Force. (Click here for another map if the earlier link does not work).

And here is an interactive map of the dozen or so permanent American military bases coming up in Iraq with billions of dollars of US tax payers’ money. As of mid-2005, the U.S. military had 106 forward operating bases in Iraq, including what the Pentagon calls 14 “enduring” bases (twelve of which are located on the map) – all of which are to be consolidated into four mega-bases.

Please juxtapose Iraq’s oil map with that of the upcoming permanent American military bases, keep in mind the 30 years provision of Iraq’s Hydrocarbon law, tie it in with the other little fact of these bases being called ‘enduring’ military bases by Pentagon and try calculating a time frame for American forces’ withdrawal from Iraq.

Still not there? Ok here is one more modest piece of information that would surely lead the reader in the correct direction. And that is the little matter of the construction of the largest embassy of any country in any country the world has ever seen.

America’s largest existing embassy, covering 10 acres and consisting of five buildings, is in the world’s most populous nation China. With a population of around 25 million, Iraq’s headcount is just twice that of the state of Illinois. However, this fortress-like compound rising beside the Tigris River will be the largest of its kind in the world, “the size of Vatican City, with the population of a small town, its own defense force, self-contained power and water, and a precarious perch at the heart of Iraq’s turbulent future.”

The designs aren’t publicly available, but the embassy is rumored to be a self-sufficient and “hardened” domain able to house a staff of 8000 people, having its own water wells, electricity plant, wastewater-treatment facility, twenty-one buildings including two major diplomatic office buildings, homes for the ambassador and his deputy, apartment buildings for staff, a swimming pool, gym, commissary, food court and an American Club.

The embassy’s 104-acre parcel is “six times larger than the United Nations’ compound in New York and two-thirds the acreage of the Mall in Washington. Protected by 15ft thick walls, its security, overseen by U.S. Marines, will be extraordinary with setbacks and perimeter no-go areas that will be especially deep structures reinforced to 2.5-times the standard, and five high-security entrances, plus an emergency entrance-exit.”

Doesn’t look like the Americans are going any where any time too soon…not to the scribe at least.

The Iraqi Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi needs to be reminded of Anwaar’s First Universal Law of Hydrocarbon. The invaders knew that all along but chose not to inform the gullible Iraqi Veep.

Thirty years are the minimum that are required to ensure that most of Iraq’s Hydrocarbon, if not to the last drop, stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction wherefrom came the invasion without being acted upon by unbalancing forces. The Barak Obamas, the Kucinichs, and the Nancy Pelosis of this world can climb the nearest trees, their public chest beating on the issue not withstanding. They all work for the same employers any way.

Any one out there that thinks otherwise?

Reader Comments:

nice article

beautifuk article Mr Anwaar .You are a intelligent person .Do please continue by writing these articles .
Thank you

jan, Belarus - 01 April, 2007

"Hydrocarbons" will be extracted by someone. If not USA then may be Russians will come in.

Anwar Sahib,

About 40K US forces will stay in Iraq for a long time. There is nothing "conspiratorial" about it.

Japan, Germany, Italy, and Philippines have had no oil. Yet the US forces had or still have their bases there.

US had a base in Peshawar for a long time where the only oil you could find was dripping form the delicious chappal kababs.

The bottom line is that super powers will always put their "hold" around the world. Ottomans did it, Romans did it, and so did the European powers.

Now let's talk about oil. Ok so Exxon and other US giants will get the big contracts in Iraq.

If you don't like US companies, then Russian Gazprom or Chinese will do the digging.

If China can make all the shoes and shirts for Americans, the same Chinese can also do the dirty work of pulling oil from the ground.

Japan has troops in Iraq and Japanese will get some share as well. The same way Australians, and UK will get their share too. That's how the "distribution" of Maal-Ghaneemat goes. Please note that Maal-Ghaneemat is the term that comes from none other than the era of Khulafa Rashideen. Now just ask to post articles about Islamic conquests too.

Every country in this world tries to protect its vital supplies. Why do you think Pakistan Army is sacrificing its soldiers in Balochistan? The day Pak Army fails to stabilize Balochistan, there are many other countries ready to send in the soldiers.

So please calm down, take a deep breath and continue working for the oil-kingdoms. The same kingdoms that enjoy stability thanks to the aircraft carriers of the good ole USA.


Dr. Qazi, United Kingdom - 02 April, 2007

I tought they come to free us

I was realy thinking that they were coming for our benefit . For came freedom .They came to help us get rid of evil and to give us some of the peace and love of Jesus (pbwh)

Amer, Indonesia - 02 April, 2007

you have a problem with the States

It is clear to me that Mr Anwaar has a problem with the United States .All I understood is that our politicians negotiated a very good deal .Our government negotiated with a democratic elected Iraqi government .We will exploite the oil and give the Iraqi's their share . The same we did with the Saudi's ,Qatari's and all those cameldrivers .The reason why the US has the contract is clear to me .We lost a lot of our soldiers in order those Arabs can have democracy , cars ,phones etc .
We have a lot of intrests any where in the world .If the hostcountries can't protect our possesions we will do it with our armed forces .The same with Iraq .We are nice folks .Look at Musharraf ;he helped us with catching ennemies and we paid him well .So I don't understand why mr Anwaar hates US .

James, United Kingdom - 05 April, 2007

Iraqis must help themselves first, others can only assisst

Amer from Iraq said,

"I was realy thinking that they were coming for our benefit . For came freedom .They came to help us get rid of evil and to give us some of the peace and love of Jesus (pbwh)"

Well the world has in fact helped Iraqis get rid of tyrant Saddam and his maniacal son Uday.

It is now up to Iraqis to sort out their mutual differences and embark on journey of self rule.


Dr. Qazi, United Kingdom - 07 April, 2007

 What do you think about the story ? Leave your comments!

Heading (Optional)
Your Comments: *

Your Name:*
E-mail (Optional):
City (Optional):
Country (Optional):
Field marked(*) are mandatory.
Note. The PakTribune will publish as many comments as possible but cannot guarantee publication of all. PakTribune keeps its rights reserved to edit the comments for reasons of clarity, brevity and morality. The external links like http:// https:// etc... are not allowed for the time being to be posted inside comments to discourage spammers.

  Speak Out View All
Military Courts
Imran - Qadri long march
Candid Corner
Exclusive by
Lt. Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan itself a victim of state-sponsored terrorism: Qamar Bajwa
Should You Try Napping During the Workday?
Suggested Sites